Skip to main content

Combining Evidence for Cross-Language Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
Advances in Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLEF 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2785))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes the official runs of our team for CLEF 2002. We took part in the monolingual tasks for each of the seven non-English languages for which CLEF provides document collections (Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Spanish, and Swedish). We also conducted our first experiments for the bilingual task (English to Dutch, and English to German), and took part in the GIRT and Amaryllis tasks. Finally, we experimented with the combination of runs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. N. J. Belkin, P. Kantor, E. A. Fox, and J. A. Shaw. Combining evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 31(3):431–448, 1995. 111, 115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Buckley, A. Singhal, and M. Mitra. New retrieval approaches using SMART: TREC 4. In D. Harman, editor, Proceedings of the Fourth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-4), pages 25-48. NIST Special Publication 500-236, 1995. 112

    Google Scholar 

  3. CLEF Resources at the University of Neuchâtel. http://www.unine.ch/info/clef. 113

  4. T. F. Cox and M. A. A. Cox. Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman & Hall, London UK, 1994. 117

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding: A dictionary lookup program. http://ding.tu-chemnitz.de. 116

  6. G. Drosdowski, editor. Duden: Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Dudenverlag, fourth edition, 1984. 113

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ergane: a free multi-lingual dictionary programme. http://www.download.travlang.com/Ergane/frames-en.html. 116

  8. E. A. Fox and J. A. Shaw. Combination of multiple searches. In Proceedings TREC-2, pages 243-252, 1994. 111, 115

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Frakes. Stemming algorithms. In W. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates, editors, Information Retrieval: Data Strcutures & Algorithms, pages 131-160. Prentice Hall, 1992. 112

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. C. Gower and P. Legendre. Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3:5–48, 1986. 117

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Harman. How effective is suffixing? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42:7–15, 1991. 112

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J.H. Lee. Analyses of multiple evidence combination. In Proceedings SIGIR’97, pages 267-276, 1997. 111, 115, 120

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. H. Lee. Combining multiple evidence from different relevant feedback methods. In Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pages 421-430, 1997. 111, 114, 115

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Monz and M. de Rijke. Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual information retrieval for Dutch, German and Italian. In C. Peters, M. Braschler, J. Gonzalo, and M. Kluck, editors, Proceedings CLEF 2001, LNCS 2406, pages 262–277. Springer Verlag, 2002. 111, 112, 113

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Pirkola, T. Hedlund, H. Keskustalo, and K. Järvelin. Dictionary-based cross-language information retrieval: Problems, methods, and research findings. Information Retrieval, 4(3–4):209–230, 2001. 116

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Pohlmann and W. Kraaij. Improving the precision of a text retrieval system with compound analysis. In J. Landsbergen, J. Odijk, K. van Deemter, and G. Veldhuijzen van Zanten, editors, Proceedings of the 7th Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Meeting (CLIN 1996), pages 115-129, 1996. 113

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3):130–137, 1980. 112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In G. Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System — Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice Hall, 1971. 114

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Schmid. Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, 1994. 113

    Google Scholar 

  20. Systran Online Translator. http://www.systransoft.com/. 119

  21. UPLIFT: Utrecht project: Linguistic information for free text retrieval. http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/uplift/. 113

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kamps, J., Monz, C., de Rijke, M. (2003). Combining Evidence for Cross-Language Information Retrieval. In: Peters, C., Braschler, M., Gonzalo, J., Kluck, M. (eds) Advances in Cross-Language Information Retrieval. CLEF 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2785. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45237-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45237-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40830-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45237-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics