Skip to main content

Automating the Synthesis of UML StateChart Diagrams from Multiple Collaboration Diagrams

  • Conference paper
The Unified Modeling Language. «UML»’98: Beyond the Notation (UML 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1618))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The use of scenarios has become a popular technique for requirements elicitation and specification building. Since scenarios capture only partial descriptions of system behavior, an approach for scenario composition and integration is needed to produce more complete specifications. The Unified Modeling Language (UML), which is emerging as a unified notation for object- oriented modeling, provides a suitable framework for scenario acquisition using Use Case diagrams and Collaboration diagrams and for behavioral specification using StateChart diagrams; yet it does not propose any specific modeling process, let alone a process for transforming scenarios into behavioral specifications. In this paper, we suggest a four-step process for synthesizing behavioral specifications from scenarios. It generates from a given set of Collaboration diagrams the StateChart diagrams of all the objects involved. Our approach is incremental and is fully compliant with the UML. Furthermore, it provides an elegant solution to the problem of scenario interleaving. The underlying algorithm has been implemented and validated with several examples, and is fit for integration into CASE tools supporting the UML.

This work is in part supported by FCAR (Fonds pour la formation des chercheurs et l’aide à la recherche au Québec) and by the SPOOL project organized by CSER (Consortium Software Engineering Research) which is funded by Bell Canada, NSERC (National Sciences and Research Council of Canada), and NRC (National Research Council of Canada).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.S., Durney, B.: Using Scenario in Deficiency-driven Requirements Engineering. In: Requirements Engineering 1993, pp. 134–141. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biermann, A.W., Ramachandran Krishnaswamy, R.: Constructing programs from example computations. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2(3), 141–153 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Booch, G.: Object Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, 2nd edn. Benjamird/Cummings Publishing Company Inc., Redwood City (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Citrin, W., Cockburn, A., Kane, J.V., Hauser, R.: Using Formalized Temporal Messageflow Diagrams. Software-Practice & Experience 25(12), 1367–1401 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman, D., Arnold, P., Bodoff, S., Dollin, C., Gilchrist, H., Hayes, F., Jeremaes, P.: Object-Oriented Development: The Fusion Method. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dano, B., Briand, H., Barbier, F.: An Approach Based on the Concept of Use Cases to Produce Dynamic Object-Oriented Specifications. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Derr, K.W.: Applying OMT: A practical step-by-step guide to using the Object Modelling Technique. In: SIGS BOOKS. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desharnais, J., Frappier, M., Khedri, R., Mili, A.: Integration of sequential scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(9), 695–708 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elkoutbi, M., Keller, R.K.: Modeling Interactive Systems with Hierarchical Petri Nets. In: To appear in a High-Performance Computing Workshop of Advanced Simulation Technology Conference, Boston (1998) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glinz, M.: An integrated formal model of scenarios based on StateCharts. In: Botella, P., Schäfer, W. (eds.) ESEC 1995. LNCS, vol. 989, pp. 254–271. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Harel, D.: StateCharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8, 231–274 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson, I., Christerson, M., Jonson, P., Overgaard, G.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering, A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Khriss, I., Elkoutbi, M., Keller, R.K.: A New Approach to the Synthesis of Behavioral Specifications from Scenarios. Technical Report GELO-82, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koskimies, K., Systa, T., Tuomi, J., Mannisto, T.: Automatic support for modeling 00software. IEEE Software 15(1), 42–50 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nardi, B.A.: The Use Of Scenarios In Design. SIGCHI Bulletin 24(4) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Potts, C., Takahashi, K., Anton, A.: Inquiry-Based Scenario Analysis of System Requirements. Technical Report GIT-CC-94/14, Georgia Institute of Technology (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rational Software Corporation: Rational Objectory Process 4.1 - Your UML Process. Santa Clara, CA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rational Software Corporation, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Sterling, MCI, Unisys, ICON, IntelliCorp, i-Logix, IBM, ObjecTime, Platinum, Ptech, Taskon, Reich Technologies, Softeam: UML notation guide, version 1.1, Rational Software Corporation, Santa Clara, CA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.: Object-oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubin, K.S., Goldberg, A.: Object Behavior Analysis. Communications of the ACM 35(9), 48–62 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Somé, S., Dssouli, R., Vaucher, J.: Toward an automation of requirements engineering using scenarios. Journal of Computing and Information 2(1), 1110–1132 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schönberger, S., Keller, R.K., Khriss, I.: Algorithmic Support for Transformations in Object-Oriented Software Development. Technical Report GELO 1983, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khriss, I., Elkoutbi, M., Keller, R.K. (1999). Automating the Synthesis of UML StateChart Diagrams from Multiple Collaboration Diagrams. In: Bézivin, J., Muller, PA. (eds) The Unified Modeling Language. «UML»’98: Beyond the Notation. UML 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48480-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48480-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66252-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48480-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics