Abstract
Business Process models seek to orchestrate business functions through the development of automated task completion, which is becoming increasingly used for Service-Oriented Architectures. This had led to many advances in the methods and tools available for software and language support in process modelling and enactment. Recent development in Business Process Execution languages, such as WS-BPEL 2.0 has widened the scope of process modelling to encompass cross-enterprise and inter-enterprise processes with a wide spread of often heterogonous business processes together with a range of associated modules for enactment, governance and assurance, to name but a few, to address non-functional requirements. Hence, the task of provisioning and managing such systems far outstrips the capabilities of human operatives, with most adaptations to operational circumstances requiring the system to be taken offline reprogrammed, recompiled and redeployed. This work focuses on the application of recent developments in language support for software autonomy whilst guaranteeing autonomic software behaviour. The issues to be addressed are stated with a supporting framework and language, Neptune. This is illustrated through a representative example with a case study evaluation reported upon.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arkin, A., Askary, S., Bloch, B., Curbera, F., Goland, Y., Kartha, N., Liu, C.K., Thatte, S., Yendluri, P., Yiu, A. (eds.): Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. WS-BPEL TC OASIS (December 2005), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.pdf
Luciano, B., Di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C.: Toward Open-World Software: Issue and Challenges. Computer 39(10), 36–43 (2006)
Adeshara, P., Juric, R., Kuljis, J., Paul, R.: A Survey of Acceptance of E-government Services in the UK. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 415–420 (2004)
Rousseau, N., McColl, E., Newton, J., Grimshaw, J., Eccles, M.: Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. British Medical Journal 326(7384), 1–8 (2003)
Dharini, B., Morrison, R., Kirby, G., Mickan, K., Warboys, B., Robertson, I., Snowdon, B., Greenwood, R.M., Seet, W.: A software architecture approach for structuring autonomic systems. In: DEAS 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Design and evolution of autonomic application software, pp. 1–7. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Kephart Jeffrey, O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)
Mazeiar, S., Tahvildari, L.: Autonomic computing: emerging trends and open problems. In: DEAS 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Design and evolution of autonomic application software, pp. 1–7. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Sharon, A., Estrin, D.: On supporting autonomy and interdependence in distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop, pp. 1–4. ACM Press, New York (1988)
Martin, R., Taleb-Bendiab, A., Miseldine, P.: Addressing the signal grounding problem for autonomic systems. In: The Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, 2006 (ICAS 2006), July 2006, pp. 21–27 (2006)
Manish, P., Hariri, S.: Autonomic computing: An overview. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Michael, E., Freisleben, B.: Supporting autonomic computing functionality via dynamic operating system kernel aspects. In: AOSD 2005: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Aspect-oriented software development, pp. 51–62. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Cristiano, C.: Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture. In: ECAI 1994: Proceedings of the workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages on Intelligent agents, pp. 56–70. Springer, New York (1995)
Yves, C.: Self-adaptive middleware: Supporting business process priorities and service level agreements. Advanced Engineering Informatics 19(3), 199–211 (2005)
Philip, M., Taleb-Bendiab, A.: Neptune: Supporting Semantics-Based Runtime Software Refactoring to Achieve Assured System Autonomy, Technical Report, Liverpool John Moores University http://neptune.cms.livjm.ac.uk/dasel
Chomsky, N.: Three models for the description of language. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions 2(3), 113–124 (1956)
Miseldine, P.: Language Support for Process-Oriented Programming of Autonomic Software Systems. PhD. Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University (2007)
Sun Microsystems, Java Pet Store demo. Java Blueprint (Accessed November 2007), https://blueprints.dev.java.net/petstore/
Microsoft, using .NET to Implement Sun Microsystems’ Java Pet Store J2EE Blueprint Application (Accessed November 2007), http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms954626.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taleb-Bendiab, A., Miseldine, P., Randles, M., Baker, T. (2008). Programming Support and Governance for Process-Oriented Software Autonomy. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds) Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2007. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68262-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68262-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68257-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68262-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)