Skip to main content

Sensitivity and Uniformity in Detecting Motion Artifacts

  • Conference paper
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4984))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1201 Accesses

Abstract

Removing artifacts due to head motion is a preprocessing procedure necessary for any fMRI analysis. In fMRI tool boxes, there have been standard algorithms for correcting motion artifacts. However, those tool boxes fail to indicate the extent to which the correction has been successfully done. Without knowing motion contamination especially after correction, the subsequent analysis using averaged fMRI data across subjects could be misleading. In this study, we proposed seven summary indices for measuring motion artifacts. The indices can be applied after motion correction by the image registration algorithms. In the simulation studies, we analyzed a real fMRI data set using a statistical method and estimated the brain activation maps. The real image data were then randomly shifted or rotated to simulate different degrees of head motion. The data contaminated by random motion were then corrected using the SPM image coregistration algorithms. The indices of motion contamination were computed using the corrected images. The corrected images were then analyzed again using the same statistical method. The consistency between the brain activation maps based on real data and those based on simulated data was used as a standard to evaluate the usefulness of the proposed seven indices. The results show that some indices are informative with regards to the degree of motion contamination in preprocessed fMRI data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Freire, L., Mangin, J.F.: Motion correction algorithms create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion. Neuroimage 14, 709–722 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hellier, P., Barillot, C., Corouge, I., Gibaud, B., Le Goualher, G., Collins, D.L., Evans, A., Malandaln, G., Ayache, N., Christensen, G.E., Johnson, H.J.: Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 1120–1130 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oakes, T.R., Johnstone, T., Walsh, K.S.O., Greischar, L.L., Alexander, A.L., Fox, A.S., Davidson, R.J.: Comparison of fMRI motion correction software tools. Neuroimage 28, 529–543 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Woods, R.P., Grafton, S.T., Holmes, C.J., Cherry, S.R., Mazziotta, J.C.: Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 22, 139–152 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alpert, N.M., Berdichevsky, D., Levin, Z., Morris, E.D., Fischman, A.J.: Improved methods for image registration. Neuroimage 3, 10–18 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ghahramani, S.: Fundamentals of Probability, 2nd edn (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16, 187–198 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognition 32, 71–86 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, J.: Weighted Kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cicchetti, D.V., Fleiss, J.L.: Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement 1, 195–201 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mechelli, A., Friston, K.J., Price, C.J.: The effects of presentation rate during word and pseudoword reading: A comparison of PET and fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 145–156 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liou, M., Su, H.R., Lee, J.D., Aston, J.A.D., Tsai, A.C., Cheng, P.E.: A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies. Neuroimage 29, 383–395 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Masumi Ishikawa Kenji Doya Hiroyuki Miyamoto Takeshi Yamakawa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chou, WC., Liou, M., Su, HR. (2008). Sensitivity and Uniformity in Detecting Motion Artifacts. In: Ishikawa, M., Doya, K., Miyamoto, H., Yamakawa, T. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69158-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69158-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69154-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69158-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics