Skip to main content

Investment Incentives from Goal-Incongruent Performance Measures: Experimental Evidence

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 2006

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 2006))

  • 2385 Accesses

Abstract

We analyze investment incentives of goal incongruent performance measures in an experiment in which ‘managers’ make one-period investment decisions and ‘owners’ predict these decisions. Three alternative performance measures are considered: earnings, ROI, and residual income. These measures serve as archetypes for a wide variety of measures used in practice. Standard theoretical predictions with respect to the investment incentives of earnings, ROI, and residual income are well documented, and they have become part of the management accounting education (e.g., [5]). They illustrate one of the basic principles of management accounting: ‘you get what you pay for’. As is well known, neither earnings nor ROI is a goal congruent performance measure, whereas residual income is goal congruent due to its conservation property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, M. C., R. M. Gillenkirch, and S. A. Welker (2006) Do You Get What You Pay For? An Experimental Analysis of Managers’ Decisions and Owners’ Expectations. Working Paper, University of Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balachandran, S. V. (2006) How Does Residual Income Affect Investment? The Role of Prior Performance Measures. Management Science 52: 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fehr, E. and A. Falk (2002) Joseph Schumpeter Lecture-Psychological foundations of incentives. European Economic Review 46: 687–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hogan, C. E. and C. M. Lewis (2005) Long-Run Investment Decisions, Operating Performance, and Shareholder Value Creation of Firms Adopting Compensation Plans Based on Economic Profits. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40: 721–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Solomons, D. (1985) Divisional Performance: Measurement and Control. Illinois: Wiener Publishing, 2 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sprinkle, G. (2003) Perspectives on Experimental Research in Managerial Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28: 287–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace, J. S. (1997) Adopting residual income-based compensation plans: Do you get what you pay for?. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 275–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arnold, M.C., Gillenkirch, R.M., Welker, S.A. (2007). Investment Incentives from Goal-Incongruent Performance Measures: Experimental Evidence. In: Waldmann, KH., Stocker, U.M. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2006. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69995-8_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics