Skip to main content

Reliability Assessment of Ensemble Classifiers: Application in Mammography

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5116))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In classifier ensembles predictions of different classifiers regarding a query are combined into one final decision. It was previously shown that using ensemble techniques can significantly improve classification performance. In this study we build upon this result and propose to use variability in the predictions of classifiers contributing to the final decision as an indicator of its reliability. The study hypothesis is tested with respect to previously proposed information-theoretic computer-aided decision (IT-CAD) system for detection of masses in mammograms. A database of 1820 regions of interest (ROIs) extracted from digital database of screening mammography (DDSM) is used. Experimental results show that the proposed reliability assessment successfully identifies decisions that can not be trusted. Further, a low correlation between reliability and the classifier output is noted. This opens a possibility of combining reliability and ensemble output into one improved decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuncheva, L.I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers. Willey-Interscience (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ranawana, R., Palade, V.: Multi-classifier systems: Review and a roadmap for developers. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems 3, 35–61 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloch, I.: Some aspects of dempster-shafer evidence theory for classification of multi-modality medical images taking partial volume effect into account. Pattern Recognition Letters 17, 905–919 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuncheva, L.I.: Switching between selection and fusion in combining classifiers: An experiment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics 32, 146–156 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, Z.-H., Jiang, Y.: Medical diagnosis with c4.5 rule preceded by artificial neural network ensemble. IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine 7, 37–42 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greene, D., Tsymbal, A., Bolshakova, N., Cunningham, P.: Ensemble clustering in medical diagnostics. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2004), pp. 575–581 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. West, D., Mangiameli, P., Rampal, R., West, V.: Ensemble strategies for a medical diagnostic decision support system: A breast cancer diagnosis application. European Journal of Operational Research 162, 532–551 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Raza, M., Gondal, I., David Green, R.L.C.: Classifier fusion using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence to predict breast cancer tumors. In: 2006 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON 2006), pp. 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mazurowski, M.A., Zurada, J.M., Tourassi, G.D.: Database decomposition of a knowledge base cad system in mammography; an ensemble approach to improve detection performance. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2008 (in press) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Habas, P.A., Zurada, J.M., Elmaghraby, A.S., Tourassi, G.D.: Reliability analysis framework for computer-assisted medical decision systems. Med. Phys. 34, 763–772 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Habas, P.A., Zurada, J.M., Elmaghraby, A.S., Tourassi, G.D.: Probabilistic framework for reliability analysis of information-theoretic cad systems in mammography. In: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, New York City, USA, August 30-September 3, 2006, pp. 6113–6116 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tourassi, G.D., Vargas-Voracek, R., Catarious Jr., D.M., Floyd Jr., C.E.: Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: A template matching scheme based on mutual information. Medical Physics 30, 2123–2130 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tourassi, G.D., Haarawood, B., Singh, S., Lo, J.Y., Floyd, C.E.: Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Medical Physics 34, 140–150 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang, Y.: Uncertainty in the output of artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 913–921 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heath, M., et al.: Current status of the digital database for screening mammography, ch. In: Digital Mammography. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mazurowski, M.A., Zurada, J.M., Tourassi, G.D. (2008). Reliability Assessment of Ensemble Classifiers: Application in Mammography. In: Krupinski, E.A. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5116. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70537-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70538-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics