Skip to main content

Maximal Termination

  • Conference paper
Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5117))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a new approach for termination proofs that uses polynomial interpretations (with possibly negative coefficients) together with the “maximum” function. To obtain a powerful automatic method, we solve two main challenges: (1) We show how to adapt the latest developments in the dependency pair framework to our setting. (2) We show how to automate the search for such interpretations by integrating “ max ” into recent SAT-based methods for polynomial interpretations. Experimental results support our approach.

Supported by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under grant GI 274/5-2 and the FWF (Austrian Science Fund) project P18763.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theoretical Computer Science 236, 133–178 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Middeldorp, A., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R., Zankl, H.: SAT solving for termination analysis with polynomial interpretations. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 340–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Middeldorp, A., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R., Zankl, H.: Maximal termination. Technical Report AIB-2008-03, RWTH Aachen, Germany (2008), http://aib.informatik.rwth-aachen.de

  4. Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P.: The dependency pair framework: Combining techniques for automated termination proofs. In: Baader, F., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3452, pp. 301–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P.: AProVE 1.2: Automatic termination proofs in the dependency pair framework. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 281–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P., Falke, S.: Mechanizing and improving dependency pairs. Journal of Automated Reasoning 37(3), 155–203 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Swiderski, S., Schneider-Kamp, P.: Proving termination by bounded increase. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) CADE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4603, pp. 443–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hardin, T., Laville, A.: Proof of termination of the rewriting system SUBST on CCL. Theoretical Computer Science 46(2,3), 305–312 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Automating the dependency pair method. Information and Computation 199(1,2), 172–199 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Tyrolean Termination Tool: Techniques and features. Information and Computation 205(4), 474–511 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong, H., Jakuš, D.: Testing positiveness of polynomials. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(1), 23–38 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Koprowski, A.: TPA: Termination proved automatically. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) RTA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4098, pp. 257–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lankford, D.: On proving term rewriting systems are Noetherian. Technical Report MTP-3, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marché, C., Zantema, H.: The termination competition. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 303–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, M., De Schreye, D., Giesl, J., Schneider-Kamp, P.: Polytool: Polynomial interpretations as a basis for termination analysis of logic programs. KU Leuven (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toyama, Y.: Counterexamples to the termination for the direct sum of term rewriting systems. Information Processing Letters 25, 141–143 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. TTT2, http://colo6-c703.uibk.ac.at/ttt2

  18. Zantema, H.: Termination. In: Terese (ed.) Term Rewriting Systems, ch. 6, pp. 181–259. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrei Voronkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Middeldorp, A., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R., Zankl, H. (2008). Maximal Termination. In: Voronkov, A. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70590-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70590-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70588-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70590-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics