Skip to main content

Model Choice for Panel Spatial Models: Crime Modeling in Japan

  • Conference paper
Advances in Data Analysis

Abstract

This paper considers the spatial patterns of crime incidents in Japan from a Bayesian point of view. We analyzed and compared different models by marginal likelihoods. From our posterior analysis, we found that the spatial pattern is different across crimes but panel SEM is selected in most of the types of crimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANSELIN, L. (1988): Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • BECKER, G.S. (1968): Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CHIB, S. (1995): Marginal Likelihood from the Gibbs Output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1313–1321.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • CHIB, S. and JELIAZKOV, I. (2001): Marginal Likelihood from the Metropolis-Hastings Output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 270–281.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GELFAND, A.E. and SMITH, A.F.M. (1990): Sampling-based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • GEWEKE, J. (1993): Bayesian Treatment of the Independent Student-t Linear Model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HOLLOWAY, G., SHANKAR, B. and RAHMAN, S. (2002): Bayesian Spatial Probit Estimation: A Primer and an Application to HYV Rice Adoption. Agricultural Econnomics, 27, 384–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAKAMU, K., POLASEK, W. and WAGO, H. (2006): Spatial Interaction of Crime Incidents in Japan. mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • LESAGE, J.P. (2000): Bayesian Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Spatial Autoregressive Models. Geographical Analysis, 32, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SUN, D., TSUTAKAWA, R.K. and SPECKMAN, P.L. (1999): Posterior Distribution of Hierarchical Models using CAR(1) Distributions. Biometrika, 86, 341–350.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • TIERNEY, L. (1994): Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions (with discussion). Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kakamu, K., Polasek, W., Wago, H. (2007). Model Choice for Panel Spatial Models: Crime Modeling in Japan. In: Decker, R., Lenz, H.J. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics