Skip to main content

Moldable Parallel Job Scheduling Using Job Efficiency: An Iterative Approach

  • Conference paper
Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing (JSSPP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4376))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Currently, job schedulers require “rigid” job submissions from users, who must specify a particular number of processors for each parallel job. Most parallel jobs can be run on different processor partition sizes, but there is often a trade-off between wait-time and run-time — asking for many processors reduces run-time but may require a protracted wait. With moldable scheduling, the choice of job partition size is determined by the scheduler, using information about job scalability characteristics.We explore the role of job efficiency in moldable scheduling, through the development of a scheduling scheme that utilizes job efficiency information. The algorithm is able to improve the average turnaround time, but requires tuning of parameters. Using this exploration as motivation, we then develop an iterative scheme that avoids the need for any parameter tuning. The iterative scheme performs an intelligent, heuristic based search for a schedule that minimizes average turnaround time. It is shown to perform better than other recently proposed moldable job scheduling schemes, with good response times for both the small and large jobs, when evaluated with different workloads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feitelson, D.: Workshops on job scheduling strategies for parallel processing, http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~feit/parsched/

  2. Feitelson, D.G., et al.: Theory and practice in parallel job scheduling. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 1291, pp. 1–34. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weil, A.M., Feitelson, D.G.: Utilization, predictability, workloads, and user runtime estimates in scheduling the ibm sp2 with backfilling. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 12(6), 529–543 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Skovira, J., et al.: The easy - loadleveler api project. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 1162, pp. 41–47. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Frachtenberg, E., et al.: Flexible CoScheduling: Mitigating load imbalance and improving utilization of heterogeneous resources. In: IPDPS, vol. 17 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cirne, W., Berman, F.: Adaptive selection of partition size for supercomputer requests. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) IPDPS-WS 2000 and JSSPP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1911, pp. 187–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cirne, W., Berman, F.: Using moldability to improve the performance of supercomputer jobs. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 62(10), 1571–1601 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Srinivasan, S., et al.: Effective selection of partition sizes for moldable scheduling of parallel jobs. In: Sahni, S.K., Prasanna, V.K., Shukla, U. (eds.) HiPC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2552, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., Sadayappan, P.: A robust scheduling strategy for moldable scheduling of parallel jobs. In: CLUSTER, pp. 92–99. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Srinivasan, S., et al.: Characterization of backfilling strategies for parallel job scheduling. In: ICPP Workshops, pp. 514–522. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frachtenberg, E., Feitelson, D.G.: Pitfalls in parallel job scheduling evaluation. In: Feitelson, D.G., et al. (eds.) JSSPP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3834, pp. 257–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., Schwiegelshohn, U.: Parallel job scheduling - a status report. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds.) JSSPP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3277, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feitelson, D.G.: Logs of real parallel workloads from production systems, http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/labs/parallel/workload/

  14. Du, J., Leung, J.Y.T.: Complexity of scheduling parallel task systems. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 2(4), 473–487 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnamurti, R., Ma, E.: An approximation algorithm for scheduling tasks on varying partition sizes in partitionable multiprocessor systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers 41(12), 1572–1579 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garey, M.R., Graham, R.L.: Bounds for multiprocessor scheduling with resource constraints. SIAM J. Comput. 4(2), 187–200 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Complexity results for multiprocessor scheduling under resource constraints. SIAM J. Comput. 4(4), 397–411 (1975)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, K., Cheng, K.H.: Job scheduling in partitionable mesh connected systems. In: ICPP, vol. 2, pp. 65–72 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tuomenoksa, D.L., Siegel, H.J.: Task scheduling on the pasm parallel processing system. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 11(2), 145–157 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eager, D.L., Zahorjan, J., Lazowska, E.D.: Speedup versus efficiency in parallel systems, pp. 76–91 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosal, D., Serazzi, G., Tripathi, S.K.: The processor working set and its use in scheduling multiprocessor systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 17(5), 443–453 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleinrock, L., Huang, J.H.: On parallel processing systems: Amdahl’s law generalized and some results on optimal design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18(5), 434–447 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McCann, C., Vaswani, R., Zahorjan, J.: A dynamic processor allocation policy for multiprogrammed shared-memory multiprocessors. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 11(2), 146–178 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sevcik, K.C.: Application scheduling and processor allocation in multiprogrammed parallel processing systems. Technical Report CSRI-282, Computer Systems Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 1A1 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosti, E., et al.: Analysis of non-work-conserving processor partitioning policies. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 949, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Downey, A.B.: Using queue time predictions for processor allocation. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, pp. 35–57. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Downey, A.B.: A parallel workload model and its implications for processor allocation. Cluster Computing 1(1), 133–145 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sevcik, K.C.: Characterizations of parallelism in applications and their use in scheduling. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 17(1), 171–180 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiang, S.H., Mansharamani, R.K., Vernon, M.K.: Use of application characteristics and limited preemption for run-to-completion parallel processor scheduling policies. In: SIGMETRICS, pp. 33–44 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Downey, A.B.: A model for speedup of parallel programs. Technical Report CSD-97-933 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rajan, A.: Evaluation of scheduling strategies for moldable parallel jobs. Master’s thesis, The Ohio State University (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eitan Frachtenberg Uwe Schwiegelshohn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sabin, G., Lang, M., Sadayappan, P. (2007). Moldable Parallel Job Scheduling Using Job Efficiency: An Iterative Approach. In: Frachtenberg, E., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. JSSPP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71035-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71035-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71034-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71035-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics