Abstract
Currently, job schedulers require “rigid” job submissions from users, who must specify a particular number of processors for each parallel job. Most parallel jobs can be run on different processor partition sizes, but there is often a trade-off between wait-time and run-time — asking for many processors reduces run-time but may require a protracted wait. With moldable scheduling, the choice of job partition size is determined by the scheduler, using information about job scalability characteristics.We explore the role of job efficiency in moldable scheduling, through the development of a scheduling scheme that utilizes job efficiency information. The algorithm is able to improve the average turnaround time, but requires tuning of parameters. Using this exploration as motivation, we then develop an iterative scheme that avoids the need for any parameter tuning. The iterative scheme performs an intelligent, heuristic based search for a schedule that minimizes average turnaround time. It is shown to perform better than other recently proposed moldable job scheduling schemes, with good response times for both the small and large jobs, when evaluated with different workloads.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Feitelson, D.: Workshops on job scheduling strategies for parallel processing, http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~feit/parsched/
Feitelson, D.G., et al.: Theory and practice in parallel job scheduling. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 1291, pp. 1–34. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Weil, A.M., Feitelson, D.G.: Utilization, predictability, workloads, and user runtime estimates in scheduling the ibm sp2 with backfilling. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 12(6), 529–543 (2001)
Skovira, J., et al.: The easy - loadleveler api project. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 1162, pp. 41–47. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Frachtenberg, E., et al.: Flexible CoScheduling: Mitigating load imbalance and improving utilization of heterogeneous resources. In: IPDPS, vol. 17 (2003)
Cirne, W., Berman, F.: Adaptive selection of partition size for supercomputer requests. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) IPDPS-WS 2000 and JSSPP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1911, pp. 187–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Cirne, W., Berman, F.: Using moldability to improve the performance of supercomputer jobs. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 62(10), 1571–1601 (2002)
Srinivasan, S., et al.: Effective selection of partition sizes for moldable scheduling of parallel jobs. In: Sahni, S.K., Prasanna, V.K., Shukla, U. (eds.) HiPC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2552, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Srinivasan, S., Krishnamoorthy, S., Sadayappan, P.: A robust scheduling strategy for moldable scheduling of parallel jobs. In: CLUSTER, pp. 92–99. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)
Srinivasan, S., et al.: Characterization of backfilling strategies for parallel job scheduling. In: ICPP Workshops, pp. 514–522. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)
Frachtenberg, E., Feitelson, D.G.: Pitfalls in parallel job scheduling evaluation. In: Feitelson, D.G., et al. (eds.) JSSPP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3834, pp. 257–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., Schwiegelshohn, U.: Parallel job scheduling - a status report. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds.) JSSPP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3277, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Feitelson, D.G.: Logs of real parallel workloads from production systems, http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/labs/parallel/workload/
Du, J., Leung, J.Y.T.: Complexity of scheduling parallel task systems. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 2(4), 473–487 (1989)
Krishnamurti, R., Ma, E.: An approximation algorithm for scheduling tasks on varying partition sizes in partitionable multiprocessor systems. IEEE Transactions on Computers 41(12), 1572–1579 (1992)
Garey, M.R., Graham, R.L.: Bounds for multiprocessor scheduling with resource constraints. SIAM J. Comput. 4(2), 187–200 (1975)
Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Complexity results for multiprocessor scheduling under resource constraints. SIAM J. Comput. 4(4), 397–411 (1975)
Li, K., Cheng, K.H.: Job scheduling in partitionable mesh connected systems. In: ICPP, vol. 2, pp. 65–72 (1989)
Tuomenoksa, D.L., Siegel, H.J.: Task scheduling on the pasm parallel processing system. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 11(2), 145–157 (1985)
Eager, D.L., Zahorjan, J., Lazowska, E.D.: Speedup versus efficiency in parallel systems, pp. 76–91 (1995)
Ghosal, D., Serazzi, G., Tripathi, S.K.: The processor working set and its use in scheduling multiprocessor systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 17(5), 443–453 (1991)
Kleinrock, L., Huang, J.H.: On parallel processing systems: Amdahl’s law generalized and some results on optimal design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18(5), 434–447 (1992)
McCann, C., Vaswani, R., Zahorjan, J.: A dynamic processor allocation policy for multiprogrammed shared-memory multiprocessors. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 11(2), 146–178 (1993)
Sevcik, K.C.: Application scheduling and processor allocation in multiprogrammed parallel processing systems. Technical Report CSRI-282, Computer Systems Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, M5S 1A1 (1993)
Rosti, E., et al.: Analysis of non-work-conserving processor partitioning policies. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. LNCS, vol. 949, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Downey, A.B.: Using queue time predictions for processor allocation. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing, pp. 35–57. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Downey, A.B.: A parallel workload model and its implications for processor allocation. Cluster Computing 1(1), 133–145 (1998)
Sevcik, K.C.: Characterizations of parallelism in applications and their use in scheduling. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 17(1), 171–180 (1989)
Chiang, S.H., Mansharamani, R.K., Vernon, M.K.: Use of application characteristics and limited preemption for run-to-completion parallel processor scheduling policies. In: SIGMETRICS, pp. 33–44 (1994)
Downey, A.B.: A model for speedup of parallel programs. Technical Report CSD-97-933 (1997)
Rajan, A.: Evaluation of scheduling strategies for moldable parallel jobs. Master’s thesis, The Ohio State University (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sabin, G., Lang, M., Sadayappan, P. (2007). Moldable Parallel Job Scheduling Using Job Efficiency: An Iterative Approach. In: Frachtenberg, E., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. JSSPP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71035-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71035-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71034-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71035-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)