Skip to main content

An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Coreference and Quotations: Can a Pronoun Located in Quotations Find Its Referent?

  • Conference paper
Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications (DAARC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4410))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many reference resolution studies omit anaphoric forms found in quotations, assuming that they may need special handling as there is insufficient discourse context to determine the referent. This paper reports on an empirical study performed to evaluate this assumption. Specifically, the study addresses the following questions: Are anaphoric expressions found in quotations sufficiently different to justify ignoring them, and is there enough context available for a system to determine the referents of anaphoric expressions found within quoted text? The current study focuses on the pronoun it within the Givenness Hierarchy framework of Gundel, Hedberg, and Zacharski [13]. We find that this framework can be used in most cases to locate the antecedent for referential it found in quoted text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Train Derails in Australia. Associated Press (Dec. 12, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bagga, A.: Evaluation of Coreferences and Coreference Resolution Systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC ’98), May 1998, pp. 563–566 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banbury, J.: How to Build a T.Rex. Discover 27(5) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byron, D.K., Tetreault, J.R.: ’A Flexible Architecture for Reference Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL ’99), pp. 229–232 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cardie, C., Wagstaff, K.: Noun Phrase Coreference as Clustering. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pp. 82–89. Association for Computational Linguistics (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castaño, J., Zhang, J., Pustejovsky, J.: Anaphora Resolution in Biomedical Literature. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Reference Resolution, Alicante, Spain (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cherry, C., Bergsma, S.: An Expectation Maximization Approach to Pronoun Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), Ann Arbor, June 2005, pp. 88–95 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dimitrov, M., et al.: A Light-weight Approach to Coreference Resolution for Named Entities in Text. In: Proceedings of the 4th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), Lisbon, September 18-20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frommer, F.J.: Mental Health Bill to Face House Vote. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Furst, R.: U, May Sue U.S. to Recover Residents’ Social Security Taxes. Star Tribune (Dec. 27, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ge, N., Hale, J., Charniak, E.: A Statistical Approach to Anaphora Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Montreal, Canada, pp. 161–170 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R.: Demonstrative Pronouns in Natural Discourse. In: Branco, A., McEnery, T., Mitkov, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC 2004), Ediçöes Colibri, Lisbon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R.: Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse. Language 69(2), 274–307 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., Zacharski, R.: Definite Descriptions and Cognitive Status in English: Why Accommodation is Unnecessary. Journal of English Language and Linguistics 5(2), 273–295 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gundel, J.K.: Information Structure and Referential Givenness/Newness: ’How Much Belongs in the Grammar? In: Müller, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the HPSG03 Conference, CSLI Publications, Stanford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gundel, J.K.: Coding Protocol for Status on the Givenness Hierarchy. Language and Cognition Class Handout (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hitt, J.: CSI: Jurassic. Discover 27(9) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jesdanun, A. (ed.): Anti-Spam Tool Ceases As Spammers Evolve. Associated Press (Dec. 27, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Keath, L.: 3 Million Muslims Begin Annual Hajj. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy, C., Boguraev, B.: Anaphora for Everyone: Pronominal Anaphora Resolution without a Parser. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 113–118 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kupść, A., et al.: Pronominal Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Text. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kunzig, R.: 20,000 Microbes Under the Sea. Discover 25(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Limjoco, V.: Vampire Weed. Discover, Web Exclusives (Oct. 26, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Matthews, K.: Murders Up in New York, Other Big Cities. Associated Press (Dec. 27, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mitkov, R.: Anaphora Resolution. Studies in Language and Linguistics. Pearson Longman, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitkov, R.: Towards a More Consistent and Comprehensive Evaluation of Anaphora Resolution Algorithms and Systems. In: Proceedings of the Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium (DAARC-2000), Lancaster, UK, pp. 96–107 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, C., Rapp, S., Strube, M.: Applying Co-Training to Reference Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, July 2002, pp. 352–359 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neumeister, L.: Fans Honor ’Godfather of Soul’ at Apollo. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ng, V., Cardie, C.: Improving Machine Learning Approaches to Coreference Resolution. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, July 2002, pp. 104–111 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robertson, J.: Online Shoppers Overwhelm iTunes Store. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Salmon-Alt, S., Romary, L.: Data Categories for a Normalized Reference Annotation Scheme. In: Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (DAARC), S. Miguel, Azores, Portugal, September 23-24, 2004, pp. 145–150 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shah, A.: Karzai: Border Fence Won. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Soon, W.M., Ng, H.T., Lim, D.C.Y.: A Machine Learning Approach to Coreference Resolution of Noun Phrases. Computational Linguistics 27(4), 521–544 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tetreault, J.R.: Analysis of Syntax-Based Pronoun Resolution Methods. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 602–605 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tetreault, J.R.: A Corpus-Based Evaluation of Centering and Pronoun Resolution. Computational Linguistics 27(4), 507–520 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Torchia, C.: U.S. Military Death Toll in Iraq Exceeds Number of Deaths in 9/11 Attacks. Associated Press (Dec. 25, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Watters, S.: The Givenness Hierarchy and the Pronoun ’It’: An Empirical Study Investigating the Cognitive Status of Being ’In Focus’. Unpublished manuscript, M.A. in Linguistics project paper, University of Minnesota, MN (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weber, H.R.: US Airways CEO: Not Upping Delta Offer. Associated Press (Dec. 28, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, X., et al.: Coreference Resolution Using Competition Learning Approach. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Sapporo, Japan, pp. 176–183 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zimmer, C.: Testing Darwin. Discover 26(2) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

António Branco

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Watters, S., Gundel, J. (2007). An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Coreference and Quotations: Can a Pronoun Located in Quotations Find Its Referent?. In: Branco, A. (eds) Anaphora: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications. DAARC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4410. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71412-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71411-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71412-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics