Abstract
Referring to some ideas of Leibniz, Frege, Boole and Łukasie-wicz, we represent fundamental concepts of rough set theory in terms of a generalization that permits to deal with the graduality of fuzzy sets. Our conjunction of rough sets and fuzzy sets is made using the Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA). DRSA have been proposed to take into account ordinal properties of data related to preferences. We show that DRSA is also relevant in case where preferences are not considered but a kind of monotonicity relating attribute values is meaningful for the analysis of data at hand. In general, monotonicity concerns relationship between different aspects of a phenomenon described by data, e.g.: “the larger the house, the higher its price” or “the more a tomato is red, the more it is ripe”. The qualifiers, like “large house”, “high price”, “red” and “ripe”, may be expressed either in terms of some measurement units, or in terms of degrees of membership to some fuzzy sets. In this perspective, the DRSA gives a very general framework in which the classical rough set approach based on indiscernibility relation can be considered as a particular case.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together. In: Słowiński, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Sets Theory, pp. 203–232. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992)
Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)
Klement, E.P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129, 1–47 (2001)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Decision rule approach. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Erghott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 507–563. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Loemker, L. (ed. and trans.), Leibniz, G.W.: Philosophical Papers and Letters, 2nd edn. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1969)
Pal, S.K., Skowron, A. (eds.): Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization: A new trends in decision making. Springer, Singapore (1999)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)
Pawlak, Z.: Rough Set Theory. Künstliche Intelligenz 3, 38–39 (2001)
Peters, J.F., et al. (eds.): Transactions on Rough Sets II. LNCS, vol. 3135. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough set based decision support. In: Burke, E.K., Kendall, G. (eds.) Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, pp. 475–527. Springer, New York (2005)
Vakarelov, D.: Consequence Relations and Information Systems. In: Słowiński, R. (ed.) Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory, pp. 391–399. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992)
Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy Set. Information Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R. (2007). Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach as a Proper Way of Handling Graduality in Rough Set Theory. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Marek, V.W., Orłowska, E., Słowiński, R., Ziarko, W. (eds) Transactions on Rough Sets VII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4400. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71663-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71663-1_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71662-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71663-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)