Zusammenfassung
Interaktiven Services, die dem Themenkreis Web 2.0 zugeordnet werden, haftet unter anderem das Attribut an, besonders leicht bedienbar zu sein. Flickr, Youtube und Wikipedia gelten als Erfolgsprojekte dieser neuen Art von interaktiven Websites. Wodurch zeichnet sich nun eine Usability 2.0 (so es sie überhaupt geben sollte) aus? Was ist zu beachten, wenn so genannte Rich Internet Applications gestaltet werden?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bosworth A (2007) Ajax Mistakes. http://alexbosworth.backpackit.com/pub/67688.
Cooper, A (2007) About Face 3. The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis.
Golder S A & Huberman B A (2006) The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2). 198–208.
Manhartsberger M (2001) Web Usability. Das Prinzip des Vertrauens. Galileo Press GmbH, Bonn.
McMullin J & Skinner G. (2007) Usability Heuristics for Rich Internet Applications. http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/usability_heuristics_for_rich_ internet_applications.
Nielsen J (1994a) Response Times: The Three Important Limits. http://www.useit.com/papers/responsetime.html.
Nielsen J (1994b) Ten Usability Heuristics. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html.
Nielsen J & Loranger H (2006) Prioritizing Web Usability. New Riders, Berkeley, CA.
Norman D A (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
Norman D A (2004) Emotional Design. Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York.
Nørgaard M & Hornbæk K (2006) Seeking inspiration from design: What do usability evaluators do in practice?: an explorative study of think-aloud testing. Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Designing Interactive systems DIS ‘06. ACM Press, New York.
O’Reilly T (2005) What Is Web 2.0. Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/ tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
Porter J (2005) Using Ajax for Creating Web Applications. http://www.uie.com/articles/ajax/.
Preece P (1994) Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Harlow.
Raymond S (2007) Ajax Usability. O’Reilly TecFeed http://www.tecfeeds.de.
Rosenberg G (2007) A Look Into the Interaction Design of the New Yahoo! Mail… and the Pros and Cons of AJAX. Interactions march + april. ACM Press, New York.
Tognazzi B (2003) First Principles of Interaction Design. http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.html.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2006). Research Based Web Design and Usability Guidelines. u.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
Wilhelm T (2007) Usability-Evaluationen im Web 2.0: Was wird sich ändern? http://usability.germanblogs.de/archive/2007/06/03/usability-evaluationen-im-web-20-was-wird-sich-aendern-1.htm
Wroblewski L (2006) AJAX & Interface Design. http://www.lukew.com/resources/articles/ajax_design.asp
Zucker, D F (2007) What Does Ajax Mean for You? ACM Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Linder, J. (2009). Die Usability von Rich Internet Applications. In: Blumauer, A., Pellegrini, T. (eds) Social Semantic Web. X.media.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72216-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72215-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72216-8
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)