Abstract
We evaluate the performance of seven classifiers as effective potential decision support tools in the cytodiagnosis of breast cancer. To this end, we use a real-world database containing 692 fine needle aspiration of the breast lesion cases collected by a single observer. The results show, in average, good overall classification performance in terms of five different tests: accuracy of 93.62%, sensitivity of 89.37%, specificity of 96%, PV+ of 92% and PV- of 94.5%. With this comparison, we identify and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches. Finally, based on these results, we give some advice regarding the selection on the classifier depending on the user’s needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng, J., Greiner, R.: Learning Bayesian Belief Network Classifiers: Algorithms and Systems. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CSCSI01), Ottawa, Canada (2001)
Cross, S.S., et al.: Which Decision Support Technologies Are Appropriate for the Cytodiagnosis of Breast Cancer? In: Jain, A., et al. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis, pp. 265–295. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)
Cross, S.S., et al.: Evaluation of a statistically derived decision tree for the cytodiagnosis of fine needle aspirates of the breast (FNAB). Cytopathology 8, 178–187 (1998)
Cross, S.S., et al.: Validation of a decision support system for the cytodiagnosis of fine needle aspirates of the breast using a prospectively collected dataset from multiple observers in a working clinical environment. Cytopathology 11, 503–512 (2000)
Cruz-Ramirez, N., Nava-Fernandez, L., Mesa, H.G.A., Martinez, E.B., Rojas-Marcial, J.E.: A Parsimonious Constraint-based Algorithm to Induce Bayesian Network Structures from Data. In: IEEE (ed.) IEEE Proceedings of the Mexican International Conference on Computer Science ENC 2005, Puebla, pp. 306–313. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)
Marcus, G.F.: Rethinking Eliminative Connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 37, 243–282 (1998)
Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., Scheines, R.: Causation, Prediction and Search, 1st edn. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 81. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cruz-Ramírez, N., Acosta-Mesa, HG., Carrillo-Calvet, H., Barrientos-Martínez, RE. (2007). Comparison of the Performance of Seven Classifiers as Effective Decision Support Tools for the Cytodiagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Case Study. In: Melin, P., Castillo, O., Ramírez, E.G., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W. (eds) Analysis and Design of Intelligent Systems using Soft Computing Techniques. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 41. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72432-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72432-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72431-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72432-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)