Skip to main content

Reasoning About Operations on Sets

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4509))

Abstract

The present paper is about a framework of formal topological reasoning originating from the fundamental work of Moss and Parikh relating to this. We add a set of unary operators involving sets to that system. This new means of expression gives us considerably more expressive power with regard to spatial operations, but the accompanying logic remains sound and semantically complete with respect to the class of all subset spaces that are enriched accordingly. Moreover, the new logic turns out to be decidable. We prove these results by relying heavily on a particular extension of the common modal formalism, viz hybrid logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moss, L.S., Parikh, R.: Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge. In: Moses, Y. (ed.) Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (TARK 1992), pp. 95–105. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heinemann, B.: Extended canonicity of certain topological properties of set spaces. In: Vardi, M.Y., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2850, pp. 135–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Heinemann, B.: A hybrid logic for reasoning about knowledge and topology. Under review for journal publication (2005), For a preliminary version see, http://www.informatik.fernuni-hagen.de/thi1/ber.ps

  4. Heinemann, B.: Reasoning about knowledge and continuity. In: Goebel, R., Sutcliffe, G. (eds.) Proceedings 19th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2006), pp. 37–42. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dabrowski, A., Moss, L.S., Parikh, R.: Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78, 73–110 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgatos, K.: Knowledge theoretic properties of topological spaces. In: Masuch, M., Polos, L. (eds.) Logic at Work 1992. LNCS, vol. 808, pp. 147–159. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Georgatos, K.: Knowledge on treelike spaces. Studia Logica 59, 271–301 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinemann, B.: Topological Modal Logics Satisfying Finite Chain Conditions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39, 406–421 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss, M.A., Parikh, R.: Completeness of certain bimodal logics for subset spaces. Studia Logica 71, 1–30 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackburn, P.: Representation, reasoning, and relational structures: a hybrid logic manifesto. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8, 339–365 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinemann, B.: A two-sorted hybrid logic including guarded jumps. In: Schmidt, R., Pratt-Hartmann, I., Reynolds, M., Wansing, H. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic 5, pp. 73–92. King’s College Publications, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I., van Benthem, J.: The logic of space. To appear (2007), See URL, http://dit.unitn.it/~aiellom/hsl/

  13. Tzanis, E.: Algebraizing hybrid logic. ILLC Publications MoL-2005-04, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2005), See also the M4M-4-workshop programme

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldblatt, R.: Logics of Time and Computation, 2nd edn. CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 7. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chellas, B.F.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Aiello, M., van Benthem, J., Bezhanishvili, G.: Reasoning about space: The modal way. Journal of Logic and Computation 13, 889–920 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinemann, B.: Topological nexttime logic. In: Kracht, M., de Rijke, M., Wansing, H., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic 1. CSLI Publications, vol. 87, pp. 99–113. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Blackburn, P., Spaan, E.: A modal perspective on the computational complexity of attribute value grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2, 129–169 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ziad Kobti Dan Wu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heinemann, B. (2007). Reasoning About Operations on Sets. In: Kobti, Z., Wu, D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4509. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72665-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72665-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72664-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72665-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics