Skip to main content

Modelling Social Attitudes of Agents

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4496))

Abstract

Several recent investigations in the field of multiple agent systems have shown interest in the problem of regulating agents’ behaviour with rules that ought to be obeyed by the agents when the agents are not enforced to comply to the rules themselves. Multiple Agent Systems where agents exhibit attitudes with respect to the above mentioned aspects are named Ethical MAS. A family of interesting problems in Ethical MAS are introduced. We then consider two sample interpretations, one based upon simple commitment to the law and to personal interest, and one based on the commitment to legality, the attention to social utility and the interest in personal advantage. Based on these three aspects we provide a classification of social attitudes of agents in EMAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carmo, O., Carmo, J.: A role based model for the normative specification of organized collective agency and agents interaction. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 6(2), 145–184 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: from individual intentions to groups and organizations. In: Lesser, V. (ed.) Proc. 1st. International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS’95), pp. 41–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dowling, C.: Intelligent agents: some ethical issues and dilemmas. In: CRPIT ’00: Selected papers from the second Australian Institute conference on Computer ethics, Darlinghurst, Australia, pp. 28–32. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Sydney (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goble, L.: A logic for deontic dilemmas. Journal of Applied Logic 3(3-4), 461–483 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kone, M.T., Shimazu, A., Nakajima, T.: The state of the art in agent communication languages. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2(3), 259–284 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Marino, P.: Moral dilemmas, collective responsibility, and moral progress. Philosophical Studies 104(2), 203–225 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Torre, L.: Contextual deontic logic: Normative agents, violations and independence. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 37(1), 33–63 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ngoc Thanh Nguyen Adam Grzech Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cristani, M., Burato, E. (2007). Modelling Social Attitudes of Agents. In: Nguyen, N.T., Grzech, A., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4496. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72830-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72830-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-72829-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-72830-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics