Abstract
In the traditional view, a language is a set of words, i.e., a function from words to boolean values. We call this view “qualitative,” because each word either belongs to or does not belong to a language. Let Σ be an alphabet, and let us consider infinite words over Σ. Formally, a qualitative language over Σ is a function A: \(\Sigma^\omega\rightarrow\mathbb{B}\). There are many applications of qualitative languages. For example, qualitative languages are used to specify the legal behaviors of systems, and zero-sum objectives of games played on graphs. In the former case, each behavior of a system is either legal or illegal; in the latter case, each outcome of a game is either winning or losing. For defining languages, it is convenient to use finite acceptors (or generators). In particular, qualitative languages are often defined using finite-state machines (so-called ω-automata) whose transitions are labeled by letters from Σ. For example, the states of an ω-automaton may represent states of a system, and the transition labels may represent atomic observables of a behavior. There is a rich and well-studied theory of finite-state acceptors of qualitative languages, namely, the theory of theω-regular languages.
This research was supported in part by the Swiss National Science Foundation and by the NSF grant CCR-0225610.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chakrabarti, A., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O., Majumdar, R.: Verifying quantitative properties using bound functions. In: Borrione, D., Paul, W. (eds.) CHARME 2005. LNCS, vol. 3725, pp. 50–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Chakrabarti, A., de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Stoelinga, M.: Resource interfaces. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 117–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Chatterjee, K., de Alfaro, L., Faella, M., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R., Stoelinga, M.: Compositional quantitative reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)
Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A.: Value iteration. In: 25 Years of Model Checking. LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R.: Compositional methods for probabilistic systems. In: Larsen, K.G., Nielsen, M. (eds.) CONCUR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2154, pp. 351–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.A., Majumdar, R.: Discounting the future in systems theory. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 1022–1037. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Henzinger, T.A. (2007). Quantitative Generalizations of Languages. In: Harju, T., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A. (eds) Developments in Language Theory. DLT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4588. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73208-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73208-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73207-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73208-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)