Skip to main content

Hierarchical Visualization for Chance Discovery

  • Conference paper
New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4570))

  • 1315 Accesses

Abstract

Chance discovery has achieved much success in discovering events that, though rare, are important to human decision making. Since humans are able to efficiently interact with graphical representations of data, it is useful to use visualizations for chance discovery. KeyGraph enables efficient visualization of data for chance discovery, but does not have provisions for adding domain-specific constraints. This contribution extends the concepts of KeyGraph to a visualization method based on the target sociogram. As the target sociogram is hierarchical in nature, it allows hierarchical constraints to be embedded in visualizations for chance discovery. The details of the hierarchical visualization method are presented and a class of problems is defined for its use. An example from software requirements engineering illustrates the efficacy of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ohsawa, Y.: Data crystallization: chance discovery extended for dealing with unobservable events. New mathematics and natural science 1(3), 373–392 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohsawa, Y.: Chance discoveries for making decisions in complex real world. New Generation Computing 20, 143–163 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ohsawa, Y.: Modelling the process of chance discovery. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.) Chance Discovery, pp. 2–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larkin, J., Simon, H.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–99 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumura, N.: Topic diffusion in a community. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.) Chance Discovery, pp. 84–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ohsawa, Y.: Keygraph: Visualized structure among event clusters. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.) Chance Discovery, pp. 262–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohsawa, Y.: Detection of earthquake risks with keygraph. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.) Chance Discovery, pp. 339–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fukuda, H.: Application to understanding consumers’ latent desires. In: Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.) Chance Discovery, pp. 383–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Northway, M.: A method for depicting social relationships obtained by sociometric testing. Sociometry 3(2), 144–150 (1940)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Northway, M.L.: A Primer of Sociometry. University of Toronto Press (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shimojima, A.: Operational constraints in diagrammatic reasoning. In: Allwein, Barwise (eds.) Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, pp. 27–48. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dey, A., Abowd, G.: Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness. In: CHI 2000 Workshop on the What, Who, Where, When, and How of Context-Awareness (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, B., Bojduj, B.: Tabu search for military supply distribution. In: InterSymp-2006, Focus Symposium on Advances in Intelligent Software Systems, Baden-Baden, Germany, August, 2006, pp. 87–91 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geraci, A.: IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zave, P.: Classification of research efforts in requirements engineering. ACM Comput. Surv. 29(4), 315–321 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, M.: Software requirements and specifications. ACM Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Welty, C.A., Selfridge, P.: Artificial intelligence and software engineering: Breaking the toy mold. Automated Software Engineering 4(3), 255–270 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gibson, V.R., Senn, J.A.: System structure and software maintenance performance. Commun. ACM 32(3), 347–358 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bohner, S., Arnold, R.: An introduction to software change impact analysis. In: Bohner, S., Arnold, R. (eds.) Software Change Impact Analysis, pp. 1–26. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leveson, N., Turner, C.: An investigation of the therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer 26(7), 18–41 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hiroshi G. Okuno Moonis Ali

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bojduj, B., Turner, C.S. (2007). Hierarchical Visualization for Chance Discovery. In: Okuno, H.G., Ali, M. (eds) New Trends in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4570. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73325-6_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73325-6_78

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73322-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73325-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics