Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4681))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1061 Accesses

Abstract

Recent advances in networking technology have increased the potential collaborations for virtual enterprises (VEs) on a global scale. Due to the dynamic nature of collaborations, building and evolving trust is essential to support the formation of VEs. There is a critical need for the new approach suited to this environment. This paper presents a trust-based approach for partner selection problem in the VEs. The proposed model explores the dynamic properties of trustworthy index, which provides a multi-perspective and interactive overview of potential partners to the decision-makers. The model uses the hybrid learning algorithm of fuzzy cognitive map (FCM). As FCM has the excellent ability in modeling complex systems, the proposed model can support historical data mining automatically, and revise the existing model according to the new requirements. Results of three experiments show that this model provides reasonable performance and high adaptability for diverse partner selection problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breite, R., Vanharanta, H.: Evaluating Collaboration and Core Competence in a Virtual Enterprise. Psych. Nology Journal 1, 391–399 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Talluri, S., Baker, R.C.: Quantitative Framework for Designing Efficient Business Process Alliances. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Piscataway, pp. 656–661 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saxton, T.: The Effects of Partner and Relationship Characteristics on Alliance Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 40, 443–461 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennies, M.G.: Characteristics and Outcomes of Entrepreneurial Collaborations: The Effect of Trust on Partnership Success, Partner Satisfaction, and Financial Performance. Phd. Thesis, Georgia State University, Robinson College Of Business (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brucker, P., Drexl, A., Mohring, R., Neumann, K., Pesch, E.: Resource-constrained Project Scheduling Notation, Classification, Models, and Methods. European Journal of Operational Research 112, 3–41 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, D., Ip, W.H., Yung, K.L.: A Heuristic Genetic Algorithm for Subcontractor Selection in a Global Manufacturing Environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C-Applications and Reviews 31(2), 189–198 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ko, C.S., Kim, T., Hwang, H.: External Partner Selection Using Tabu Search Heuristics in Distributed Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research 39(17), 3959–3974 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, N., Su, P.: Selection of Partners in Virtual Enterprise Paradigm. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 21, 119–131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, D.Z., Yamashiro, M.: A Pragmatic Approach for Optimal Selection of Plant Specific Process Plans in a Virtual Enterprise. Production Planning & Control 14(6), 562–570 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Degraeve, Z., Roodhooft, F.: A mathematical programming approach for procurement using activity based costing. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 27(1-2), 69–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boon, B.H., Sierksma, G.: Team Formation: Matching Quality Supply and Quality Demand. European Journal of Operational Research 148, 277–292 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sha, D.Y., Che, Z.H.: Virtual Integration with a Multi-criteria Partner Selection Model for the Multi-echelon Manufacturing System. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 25(7-8), 793–802 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer, M., Jähn, H., Teich, T.: Optimizing the Selection of Partners in Production Networks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20, 593–601 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, C.W.R., Chen, H.Y.S.: A Fuzzy Strategic Alliance Selection Framework for Supply Chain Partnering under Limited Evaluation Resources. Computers in Industry 55, 159–179 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hajidimitriou, Y.A., Georgiou, A.C.: A Goal Programming Model for Partner Selection Decisions in International Joint Ventures. European Journal of Operational Research 138, 649–662 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Elements of a Base ve Infrastructure. Computers in Industry 51, 139–163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipnack, J., Stamps, J.: Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., Pezzulo, G.: Cooperating through a Belief-based Trust Computation. In: Proceedings of the twelfth IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise, Roma, Italy, pp. 263–268. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B.B.: Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In: Bunker, B.B., Rubin, J.Z. (eds.) Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch, pp. 133–173. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Borchert, J.E., Goos, P., Hagenhoff, S.: Empirical Study of Innovation Management in Focal Networks: Partner Selection and Realization. In: PICMET 2006 Proceedings. Istanbul, Turkey (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stach, W., Kurgan, L., Pedrycz, W., Reformat, M.: Genetic Learning of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 153, 371–401 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Papageorgiou, E.I., Stylios, C.D., Groumpos, P.P.: Fuzzy Cognitive Map Learning Based on Nonlinear Hebbian Rule. In: Gedeon, T.D., Fung, L.C.C. (eds.) ECOOP 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2903, pp. 254–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Donga, L., Glaister, K.W.: Motives and Partner Selection Criteria in International Strategic Alliances: Perspectives of Chinese firms. International Business Review 15, 577–600 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laister, K.W., Buckley, P.J.: Task-related and Partner-related Selection Criteria in UK International Joint Ventures. British Journal of Management 8, 199–222 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

De-Shuang Huang Laurent Heutte Marco Loog

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, W., Zhu, Y. (2007). A Trust-Based Model Using Learning FCM for Partner Selection in the Virtual Enterprises. In: Huang, DS., Heutte, L., Loog, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications. With Aspects of Theoretical and Methodological Issues. ICIC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4681. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74171-8_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74171-8_68

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74170-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74171-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics