Skip to main content

Structural Aspects of the Evaluation of Agent Organizations

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II (COIN 2006)

Abstract

A multi-agent system can be analyzed and specified as an organization consisting of roles and their relations. The performance of an organization depends on many factors among which the type of its organizational structure, i.e., the set of relations holding between its roles. This work focuses on the structure of organizations and addresses the issue of the analysis, evaluation, and comparison of organizational structures which can contribute to develop general methods for the assessment of multi-agent systems’ performance. Specifically, quantitative concepts from graph theory are used to provide numerical analyses of organizational structures. It is argued that these analyzes can be used for evaluating to what extent an organizational structure exhibits some characteristic properties such as robustness, flexibility and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Etzioni, A.: Modern Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedell, M.F.: Organizations as semilattices. American Sociological Review 32, 46–54 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Dastani, M., Royakkers, L.: Foundations of organizational structures in multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2005. Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, July 2005, pp. 690–697. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Harary, F.: Graph theoretic methods in the management sciences. Managemenet Science 5(4), 387–403 (1959)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Harary, F.: Status and contrastatus. Sociometry 22, 23–43 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A Survey of Multi-Agent Organizational Paradigms. Computer Science Technical Report 04-45, University of Massachusetts (May 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: Using ODML to model and design organizations for multi-agent systems. In: Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Matson, E., Sichman, J., Utrecht (eds.) Proceedings ofthe International Workshop on Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems (OOOP), AAMAS 2005 (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krackhardt, D.: Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In: Carley, C.M., Prietula, M.J. (eds.) Computational Organization Theory, pp. 89–110. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malone, T.W.: Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Sciences 33(10), 1317–1332 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malone, T.W., Smith, S.A.: Modeling the performance of organizational structures. Operational Research 36(3), 421–436 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgenstern, O.: Prolegomena to a theory of organizations. Manuscript (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Powell, W.W.: Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 12, 295–336 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Scerri, P., Xu, Y., Liao, E., Lai, J., Sycara, K.: Scaling teamwork to very large teams. In: AAMAS 2004. Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schoemaker, M.: Identity in flexible organizations: Experiences. Dutch Organizations Creativity and Innovation Management 12 (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Selznick, P.: Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review 13, 25–35 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, A.: An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Methuen and Co., London (1776)

    Google Scholar 

  17. So, Y., Chon, K.: A performance model for tree-structuresd multiagent organizations in faulty environments. In: Boissier, O., Dignum, V., Matson, E., Sichman, J., Utrecht (eds.) Proceedings ofthe International Workshop on Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems (OOOP), AAMAS 2005 (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stimson, W.: The Robust Organization: Transforming Your Company Using Adaptive Design. Irwin Professional Publishing (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. van der Broek, E.L., Jonker, C.M., Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J., Yolum, P.: Formal modeling and analysis of organizations. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3913, pp. 18–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pablo Noriega Javier Vázquez-Salceda Guido Boella Olivier Boissier Virginia Dignum Nicoletta Fornara Eric Matson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grossi, D., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Dastani, M., Royakkers, L. (2007). Structural Aspects of the Evaluation of Agent Organizations. In: Noriega, P., et al. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems II. COIN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4386. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74459-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74459-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74457-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74459-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics