Skip to main content

Solving a Practical Examination Timetabling Problem: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2007 (ICCSA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4707))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a Greedy-Least Saturation Degree (G-LSD) heuristic (which is an adaptation of the least saturation degree heuristic) to solve a real-world examination timetabling problem at the University Kebangsaan, Malaysia. We utilise a new objective function that was proposed in our previous work to evaluate the quality of the timetable. The objective function considers both timeslots and days in assigning exams to timeslots, where higher priority is given to minimise students having consecutive exams on the same day. The objective also tries to spread exams throughout the examination period. This heuristic has the potential to be used for the benchmark examination datasets (e.g. the Carter datasets) as well as other real world problems. Computational results are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McCollum, B.: University timetabling: Bridging the gap between research and practice. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, H. (eds.): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. 30th August-1st September 2006, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 15–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, E.K., Elliman, D.G., Ford, P.H., Weare, R.F.: Examination timetabling in British universities - A survey. In: Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. LNCS, vol. 1153, pp. 76–92. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, E.K., Kingston, J., de Werra, D.: In: Gross, J., Yellen, J. (eds.) Applications to timetabling. Handbook of Graph Theory, pp. 445–474. Chapman Hall/CRC Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Gaspero, L., Schaerf, A.: Tabu search techniques for examination timetabling. In: Burke, E., Erben, W. (eds.) PATAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 2079, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Erben, W.: A grouping genetic algorithm for graph coloring and exam timetabling. In: Burke, E., Erben, W. (eds.) PATAT 2000. LNCS, vol. 2079, pp. 132–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Côté, P.: A hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the uncapacitated exam proximity problem. In: Burke, E.K., Trick, M.A. (eds.) PATAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3616, pp. 294–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowsland, K.: Off the peg or made to measure. In: Burke, E.K., Carter, M. (eds.) PATAT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1408, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke, E.K., McCollum, B., Meisels, A., Petrovic, S., Qu, R.: A graph-based hyper-heuristic for educational timetabling problems. European Journal of Operational Research 176, 177–192 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Eley, M.: Ant algorithm for the exam timetabling problem. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, E.K. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. LNCS, vol. 1153, pp. 167–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Welsh, D.J.A., Powell, M.B.: The upper bound for the chromatic number of a graph and its application to timetabling problems. The Computer Journal 11, 41–47 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdullah, S., Ahmadi, S., Burke, E.K., Dror, M.: Investigating Ahuja-Orlin’s Large Neighbourhood Search Approach for Examination Timetabling. OR Spectrum 29(2), 351–372 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Qu, R, Burke, E., McCollum, B., Merlot, L.T.G., Lee, S.Y.: A survey of search methodologies and automated approaches for examination timetabling. Technical Report No. NOTTCS-TR-2006-4, School of Computer Science & IT, University of Nottingham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burke, E.K., Newall, J.P., Weare, R.F.: A Memetic Algorithm for University Exam Timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling I. LNCS, vol. 1153, pp. 3–21. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burke, E.K., Newall, J.P., Weare, R.F.: Initialization strategies and diversity in evolutionary timetabling. Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 81–103 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Burke, E.K., Newall, J.P.: A multistage evolutionary algorithm for the timetable problem. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation 3, 63–74 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter, M.W.: A survey of practical applications of examination timetabling. Operations Research 34, 193–202 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Merlot, L.T.G., Boland, N., Hughes, B.D., Stuckey, P.J.: A hybrid algorithm for the examination timetabling problem. In: Burke, E.K., De Causmaecker, P. (eds.) PATAT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2740, pp. 207–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Asmuni, H., Burke, E.K., Garibaldi, J.M., McCollum, B.: Fuzzy multiple ordering criteria for examination timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Trick, M.A. (eds.) PATAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3616, pp. 334–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Ayob, M., Burke, E.K., Kendall, G.: An iterative re-start variable neighbourhood search for the examination timetabling problem. In: Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. LNCS, vol. 1153, pp. 336–344. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carter, M.W., Laporte, G., Lee, S.Y.: Examination timetabling: Algorithmic strategies and applications. Journal of Operational Research Society 47(3), 373–383 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Osvaldo Gervasi Marina L. Gavrilova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ayob, M., Malik, A.M.A., Abdullah, S., Hamdan, A.R., Kendall, G., Qu, R. (2007). Solving a Practical Examination Timetabling Problem: A Case Study. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2007. ICCSA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4707. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74484-9_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74484-9_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74482-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74484-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics