Skip to main content

Comparing Methods for Multi-class Probabilities in Medical Decision Making Using LS-SVMs and Kernel Logistic Regression

  • Conference paper
Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2007 (ICANN 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4669))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we compare thirteen different methods to obtain multi-class probability estimates in view of two medical case studies. The basic classification method used to implement all methods are least squares support vector machine (LS-SVM) classifiers. Results indicate that multi-class kernel logistic regression performs very well, together with a method based on ensembles of nested dichotomies. Also, a Bayesian LS-SVM method imposing sparseness performed very well for methods that combine binary probabilities into multi-class probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allwein, E.L., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: Reducing multiclass to binary: a unifying approach for margin classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1, 113–141 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suykens, J.A.K., Vandewalle, J.: Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 9, 293–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suykens, J.A.K., Van Gestel, T., De Brabanter, J., De Moor, B., Vandewalle, J.: Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, Singapore (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Gestel, T., Suykens, J.A.K., Lanckriet, G., Lambrechts, A., De Moor, B., Vandewalle, J.: Bayesian framework for least-squares support vector machine classifiers, Gaussian processes, and kernel Fisher discriminant analysis. Neural Comput. 14, 1115–1147 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Platt, J.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. In: Smola, A.J., Bartlett, P.L., Scholkopf, B., Schuurmans, D. (eds.) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lin, H.-T., Lin, C.-J., Weng, R.C.: A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zadrozny, B., Elkan, C.: Transforming classifier scores into accurate multiclass probability estimates. In: Proc. 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 694–699 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cawley, G.C.: Leave-one-out cross-validation based model selection criteria for weighted LS-SVMs. In: Proc. 19th International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 2970–2977 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacKay, D.J.C.: Probable networks and plausible predictions - a review of practical Bayesian methods for supervised neural networks. Netw.-Comput. Neural. Syst. 6, 469–505 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, C., Van Gestel, T., Suykens, J.A.K., Van Huffel, S., Vergote, I., Timmerman, D.: Preoperative prediction of malignancy of ovarian tumors using least squares support vector machines. Artif. Intell. Med. 28, 281–306 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayer, M., Brunk, H., Ewing, G., Reid, W., Silverman, E.: An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Ann. Math. Stat. 26, 641–647 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Refregier, P., Vallet, F.: Probabilistic approach for multiclass classification with neural networks. In: Proc. International Conference on Artificial Networks, pp. 1003–1007 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, E., Kramer, S.: Ensembles of nested dichotomies for multi-class problems. In: Proc. 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, D., Knerr, S., Personnaz, L., Dreyfus, G.: Pairwise neural network classifiers with probabilistic outputs. In: Tesauro, G., Touretzky, D.S., Leen, T.K. (eds.) Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 7, pp. 1109–1116. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Classification by pairwise coupling. Ann. Stat. 26, 451–471 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, T.-F., Lin, C.-J., Weng, R.C.: Probability estimates for multi-class classification by pairwise coupling. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 975–1005 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, T.-K., Weng, R.C., Lin, C.-J.: Generalized Bradley-Terry models and multi-class probability estimates. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 85–115 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Duan, K., Keerthi, S.S., Chu, W., Shevade, S.K., Poo, A.N.: Multi-category classification by soft-max combination of binary classifiers. In: Windeatt, T., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2709, pp. 125–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karsmakers, P., Pelckmans, K., Suykens, J.A.K.: Multi-class kernel logistic regression: a fixed-size implementation. Accepted for presentation at the 20th International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, J., Hastie, T.: Kernel logistic regression and the import vector machine. J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 185–205 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Timmerman, D., Valentin, L., Bourne, T.H., Collins, W.P., Verrelst, H., Vergote, I.: Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus statement from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. 16, 500–505 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proc. 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1137–1143 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brazdil, P.B., Soares, C.: A comparison of ranking methods for classification algorithm selection. In: López de Mántaras, R., Plaza, E. (eds.) ECML 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1810, pp. 63–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Joaquim Marques de Sá Luís A. Alexandre Włodzisław Duch Danilo Mandic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Calster, B. et al. (2007). Comparing Methods for Multi-class Probabilities in Medical Decision Making Using LS-SVMs and Kernel Logistic Regression. In: de Sá, J.M., Alexandre, L.A., Duch, W., Mandic, D. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2007. ICANN 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4669. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74695-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74695-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74693-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74695-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics