Skip to main content

Models for Identifying Structures in the Data: A Performance Comparison

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2007)

Abstract

This paper reports on the unsupervised analysis of seismic signals recorded in Italy, respectively on the Vesuvius volcano, located in Naples, and on the Stromboli volcano, located North of Eastern Sicily. The Vesuvius dataset is composed of earthquakes and false events like thunders, man-made quarry and undersea explosions. The Stromboli dataset consists of explosion-quakes, landslides and volcanic microtremor signals. The aim of this paper is to apply on these datasets three projection methods, the linear Principal Component Analysis (PCA), the Self-Organizing Map (SOM), and the Curvilinear Component Analysis (CCA), in order to compare their performance. Since these algorithms are well known to be able to exploit structures and organize data providing a clear framework for understanding and interpreting their relationships, this work examines the category of structural information that they can provide on our specific sets. Moreover, the paper suggests a breakthrough in the application area of the SOM, used here for clustering different seismic signals. The results show that, among the three above techniques, SOM better visualizes the complex set of high-dimensional data discovering their intrinsic structure and eventually appropriately clustering the different signal typologies under examination, discriminating the explosion-quakes from the landslides and microtremor recorded at the Stromboli volcano, and the earthquakes from natural (thunders) and artificial (quarry blasts and undersea explosions) events recorded at the Vesuvius volcano.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Demartines, P., Herault, J.: Curvilinear Component Analysis: A Self-Organizing Neural Network for Nonlinear Mapping of Data Sets. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 8(1), 148–154 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Esposito, A.M., Giudicepietro, F., Scarpetta, S., D’Auria, L., Marinaro, M., Martini, M.: Automatic discrimination among landslide, explosion-quake and microtremor seismic signals at Stromboli volcano using Neural Networks. Bulletin Seismological Society of America (BSSA) 96(4A), 1230–1240 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Esposito, A.M., Scarpetta, S., Giudicepietro, F., Masiello, S., Pugliese, L., Esposito, A.: Nonlinear Exploratory Data Analysis Applied to Seismic Signals. In: Apolloni, B., Marinaro, M., Nicosia, G., Tagliaferri, R. (eds.) WIRN 2005 and NAIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3931, pp. 70–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jollife, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kohonen, T., Hynninen, J., Kangas, J., Laaksonen, J.: SOM_PAK: The Self-Organizing Map Program Package, Report A31. Helsinki University, Finland (1996), Also available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/research/som_lvq_pak.shtml

  6. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, Series in Information Sciences, 2nd edn., vol. 30. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J.A., Lendasse, A., Verleysen, M.: Nonlinear Projection with Curvilinear Distances: Isomap versus Curvilinear Distance Analysis. Neurocomputing 57, 49–76 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makhoul, J.: Linear Prediction: a Tutorial Review. In: Makhoul, J. (ed.) Proceeding of IEEE, pp. 561–580. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scarpetta, S., Giudicepietro, F., Ezin, E.C., Petrosino, S., Del Pezzo, E., Martini, M., Marinaro, M.: Automatic Classification of Seismic Signals at Mt. Vesuvius Volcano, Italy, Using Neural Networks, Bulletin Seismological Society of America (BSSA), 95, 185–196 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wish, M., Carroll, J.D.: Multidimensional Scaling and its Applications. In: Krishnaiah, P.R., Kanal, L.N. (eds.) Handbook of Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 317–345. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bruno Apolloni Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esposito, A., Esposito, A.M., Giudicepietro, F., Marinaro, M., Scarpetta, S. (2007). Models for Identifying Structures in the Data: A Performance Comparison. In: Apolloni, B., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4694. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74829-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74829-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74828-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74829-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics