Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Supports the Coelomata Clade of Animals

  • Conference paper
Comparative Genomics (RECOMB-CG 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 4751))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

Many intron positions are conserved in varying subsets of eukaryotic genomes and, consequently, comprise a potentially informative class of phylogenetic characters. Roy and Gilbert developed a method of phylogenetic reconstruction using the patterns of intron presence-absence in eukaryotic genes and, applying this method to the analysis of animal phylogeny, obtained support for an Ecdysozoa clade ([1]). The critical assumption in the method was the independence of the rates of intron loss in different branches of the phylogenetic. Here, this assumption is refuted by showing that the branch-specific intron loss rates are strongly correlated. We show that different tree topologies are obtained, in each case with a significant statistical support, when different subsets of intron positions are analyzed. The analysis of the conserved intron positions supports the Coelomata topology, i.e., a clade comprised of arthropods and chordates, whereas the analysis of more variable intron positions favors the Ecdysozoa topology, i.e., a clade of arthropods and nematodes. We show, however, that the support for Ecdysozoa is fully explained by parallel loss of introns in nematodes and arthropods, a factor that does not contribute to the analysis of the conserved introns. The developed procedure for the identification and analysis of conserved introns and other characters with minimal or no homoplasy is expected to be useful for resolving many hard phylogenetic problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roy, S.W., Gilbert, W.: Resolution of a deep animal divergence by the pattern of intron conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 102, 4403–4408 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Felsenstein, J.: Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Snel, B., Bork, P., Huynen, M.A.: Genome phylogeny based on gene content. Nat. Genet. 21, 108–110 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Grishin, N.V., Tatusov, R.L., Koonin, E.V.: Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 1 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Grishin, N.V., Koonin, E.V.: Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genet. 18, 472–479 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Snel, B., Huynen, M.A., Dutilh, B.E.: Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59, 191–209 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rokas, A., Holland, P.W.: Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 454–459 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nei, M., Kumar, S.: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford Univ, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., Philippe, H.: Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 361–375 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boore, J.L.: The use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 439–446 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fedorov, A., Merican, A.F., Gilbert, W.: Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 99, 16128–16133 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogozin, I.B., Wolf, Y.I., Sorokin, A.V., Mirkin, B.G., Koonin, E.V.: Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive, lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution. Curr. Biol. 13, 1512–1517 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sverdlov, A.V., Rogozin, I.B., Babenko, V.N., Koonin, E.V.: Conservation versus parallel gains in intron evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 1741–1748 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brusca, R.C., Brusca, G.J.: Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raff, R.A: The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haeckel, E.: Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. G.Reimer, Berlin (1866)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Field, K.G., Olsen, G.J., Lane, D.J., Giovannoni, S.J., Ghiselin, M.T., Raff, E.C., Pace, N.R., Raff, R.A.: Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science 239, 748–753 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turbeville, J.M., Pfeifer, D.M., Field, K.G., Raff, R.A.: The phylogenetic status of arthropods, as inferred from 18s rrna sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 669–686 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aguinaldo, A.M., Turbeville, J.M., Linford, L.S., Rivera, M.C., Garey, J.R., Raff, R.A., Lake, J.A.: Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489–493 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Telford, M.J., Copley, R.R.: Animal phylogeny: fatal attraction. Curr. Biol. 15, 296–299 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Felsenstein, J.: Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401–410 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reyes, A., Pesole, G., Saccone, C.: Long-branch attraction pheonomenon and the impact of among-site rate variation on rodent phylogeny. Gene 259, 177–187 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Philippe, H., Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H.: Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of ecdysozoa, lophotrochozoa, and protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1246–1253 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Giribet, G., Distel, D.L., Polz, M., Sterrer, W., Wheeler, W.C.: Triploblastic relationships with emphasis on the acoelomates and the position of gnathostomulida, cycliophora, plathelminthes, and chaetognatha: a combined approach of 18s rdna sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 49, 539–562 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peterson, K.J., Eernisse, D.J.: Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18s rdna gene sequences. Evol. Dev. 3, 170–205 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mallatt, J., Winchell, C.J.: Testing the new animal phylogeny: first use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rrna gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 289–301 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. de Rosa, R., Grenier, J.K., Andreeva, T., Cook, C.E., Adoutte, A., Akam, M., Carroll, S.B., Balavoine, G.: Hox genes in brachiopods and priapulids and protostome evolution. Nature 399, 772–776 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Manuel, M., Kruse, M., Muller, W.E., Parco, Y.L.: The comparison of beta-thymosin homologues among metazoa supports an arthropod-nematode clade. J. Mol. Evol. 51, 378–381 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Adoutte, A., Balavoine, G., Lartillot, N., Lespinet, O., Prud’homme, B., de Rosa, R.: The new animal phylogeny: reliability and implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 97, 4453–4456 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Valentine, J.W., Collins, A.G.: The significance of moulting in ecdysozoan evolution. Evol. Dev. 2, 152–156 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Collins, A.G., Valentine, J.W.: Defining phyla: evolutionary pathways to metazoan body plans. Evol. Dev. 3, 432–442 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Telford, M.J., Budd, G.E.: The place of phylogeny and cladistics in evo-devo research. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47, 479–490 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mushegian, A.R., Garey, J.R., Martin, J., Liu, L.X.: Large-scale taxonomic profiling of eukaryotic model organisms: a comparison of orthologous proteins encoded by the human, fly, nematode, and yeast genomes. Genome Res. 8, 590–598 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Blair, J.E., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T., Hedges, S.B.: The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2(7) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Koonin, E.V.: Coelomata and not ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis. Genome Res. 14, 29–36 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stuart, G.W., Berry, M.W.: An svd-based comparison of nine whole eukaryotic genomes supports a coelomate rather than ecdysozoan lineage. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 204 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Philip, G.K., Creevey, C.J., McInerney, J.O.: The opisthokonta and the ecdysozoa may not be clades: stronger support for the grouping of plant and animal than for animal and fungi and stronger support for the coelomata than ecdysozoa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 1175–1184 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zdobnov, E.M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Bork, P.: Consistency of genome-based methods in measuring metazoan evolution. FEBS Lett. 579, 3355–3361 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ciccarelli, F.D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C.J., Snel, B., Bork, P.: Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311, 1283–1287 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Telford, M.J.: The multimeric beta-thymosin found in nematodes and arthropods is not a synapomorphy of the ecdysozoa. Evol. Dev. 6, 90–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brinkmann, H., van der Giezen, M., Zhou, Y., de Raucourt, G.P., Philippe, H.: An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 54, 743–757 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Dopazo, H., Dopazo, J.: Genome-scale evidence of the nematode-arthropod clade. Genome Biol 6(5), R41 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Copley, R.R., Aloy, P., Russell, R.B., Telford, M.J.: Systematic searches for molecular synapomorphies in model metazoan genomes give some support for ecdysozoa after accounting for the idiosyncrasies of caenorhabditis elegans. Evol. Dev. 6, 164–169 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H., Philippe, H.: Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol. Suppl. 1 7, S4 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hedges, S.B.: The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 838–849 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Telford, M.J.: Animal phylogeny: back to the coelomata? Curr. Biol. 14, R274–276 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jones, M., Blaxter, M.: Evolutionary biology: animal roots and shoots. Nature 434, 1076–1077 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rogozin, I.B., Wolf, Y.I., Carmel, L., Koonin, E.V.: Ecdysozoan clade rejected by genome-wide analysis of rare amino acid replacements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1080–1090 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Przytycka, T.M.: An important connection between network motifs and parsimony models. In: Apostolico, A., Guerra, C., Istrail, S., Pevzner, P., Waterman, M. (eds.) RECOMB 2006. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3909, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Nguyen, H.D, Yoshihama, M., Kenmochi, N.: New maximum likelihood estimators for eukaryotic intron evolution. PLoS Comput. Biol. 1(7), 79 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Farris, J.S.: Phylogenetic analysis under dollo’s law. Syst. Zool. 26, 77–88 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rogozin, I.B., Babenko, V.N., Wolf, Y.I., Koonin, E.V.: Dollo parsimony and reconstruction of genome evolution. In: Albert, V.A. (ed.) Parsimony, Phylogeny, and Genomics, pp. 190–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Felsenstein, J.: Inferring phylogenies from protein sequences by parsimony, distance, and likelihood methods. Methods Enzymol 266, 418–427 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C.: Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme: analysis of dna and amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 27, 326–335 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fedorov, A., Roy, S., Fedorova, L., Gilbert, W.: Mystery of intron gain. Genome Res. 13, 2236–2241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Roy, S.W., Penny, D.: Smoke without fire: most reported cases of intron gain in nematodes instead reflect intron losses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 2259–2262 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Carmel, L., Wolf, Y.I., Rogozin, I.B., Koonin, E.V.: Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res. (in press, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Brinkmann, H., Philippe, H.: Archaea sister group of bacteria? indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 817–825 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Philippe, H., Germot, A., Moreira, D.: The new phylogeny of eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 596–601 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Brochier, C., Philippe, H.: Phylogeny: a non-hyperthermophilic ancestor for bacteria. Nature 417, 244 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA

    Jie Zheng, Igor B. Rogozin, Eugene V. Koonin & Teresa M. Przytycka

Authors
  1. Jie Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor B. Rogozin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugene V. Koonin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Teresa M. Przytycka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Glenn Tesler Dannie Durand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zheng, J., Rogozin, I.B., Koonin, E.V., Przytycka, T.M. (2007). A Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Supports the Coelomata Clade of Animals. In: Tesler, G., Durand, D. (eds) Comparative Genomics. RECOMB-CG 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4751. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74960-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74960-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74959-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74960-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics