Skip to main content

A Whether Forecast

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4363))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that only factive propositional attitude predicates are felicitous with wh- (indirect question) complements. It has also been noted that so-called emotive factive predicates are only felicitous with some, not all, indirect question complements. But the reasons for these two constraints have remained unclear. I propose a competition-based explanation in terms of optimality theoretic pragmatics: Due to the competition with factive predicates, predicates like believe are infelicitous with complements automatically verifying the factive presupposition; and emotive factive predicates are infelicitous with wh- complements to the extent that these complements compete with more informative that complements. To arrive at these results, it is necessary to assume an analysis of questions on which they denote propositions and to be more careful than has been customary about the formulation of the presuppositions of factive and what I call super-factive predicates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abels, K.: Remarks on Grimshaw’s clausal typology. In: Maier, E., Bary, C., Huitink, J. (eds.) Proceedings of SuB9, Nijmegen, pp. 1–15 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D.: Presuppositions. In: van Benthem, J., ter Meulen, A. (eds.) The Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 939–1008. Elsevier, North-Holland (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: Lexical Pragmatics. Journal of Semantics 15, 115–162 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17, 189–216 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: Lexical Semantics and Pragmatics. In: Hamm, F., Zimmermann, E. (eds.) Semantics (= Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 10), pp. 27–58 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: Pragmatics and the lexicon. In: Horn, L., Ward, G. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 488–514. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R.: Embedded Implicatures and Optimality Theoretic Pragmatics. In: Solstad, T., Grønn, A., Haug, D. (eds.) A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø, Oslo, pp. 11–29 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, R., Zeevat, H.: Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave MacMillan, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boër, S.: Towards a Theory of Indirect Question Clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 307–345 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • d’Avis, F.: On the interpretation of wh- clauses in exclamative environments. Theoretical Linguistics 28, 5–32 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egré, P.: Question-Embedding and Factivity. Presentation at the 3iéme Journée de Sémantique et Modélisation, ENS, Paris (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D.: The Grammar of Emotive and Exclamative Sentences in English. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallin, D.: Intensional and higher-order modal logic, Amsterdam (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, J.: Resolving Questions, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 567–609 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: English Wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, J.: Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 279–326 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Semantic analysis of Wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 175–233 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huddleston, R.: Remarks on the Construction. You won’t believe who Ed has married. Lingua 91, 175–184 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, P., Kiparsky, C.: Fact. In: Bierwisch, M., Heidolph, K.E. (eds.) Progress in Linguistics, pp. 143–173. Mouton, The Hague (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U.: Lexical Selection and Quantificational Variability in Embedded Interrogatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 325–389 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U.: Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. OUP, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: Whether Report. In: Pauli, T. (ed.) Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Lennart Åqvist on his Fiftieth Birthday, Uppsala, pp. 194–206 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E.: Kontextabhängigkeit. In: Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Berlin, pp. 156–229 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, E.: Knowledge and Desire, from a German Perspective. In: Solstad, T., Grønn, A., Haug, D. (eds.) A Festschrift for Kjell Johan Sæbø, Oslo, pp. 211–223 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Balder D. ten Cate Henk W. Zeevat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sæbø, K.J. (2007). A Whether Forecast. In: ten Cate, B.D., Zeevat, H.W. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4363. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75144-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75144-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75143-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75144-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics