Abstract
The assignment of tasks to human performers is a critical component in people-centric business process management systems. Workflow management systems typically assign work items using strategies that only consider qualified resources. There are, however, situations, where this approach falls short. For instance, in emergency response situations, tasks need to be carried out by resources that are available immediately, even if they do not match all skill requirements. This paper compares the performance of a set of six task assignment mechanisms for workflow applications using a scenario from the emergency management domain. In particular, we develop and simulate assignment strategies inspired by stimulus/response models derived from swarm intelligence, and benchmark these strategies against conventional task assignment strategies. Our findings show that swarm intelligence-based approaches outperform the traditional assignment of tasks in ad-hoc organizations, and that workflow-based emergency management systems could benefit significantly from these novel task assignment strategies.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WfMC Terminology and Glossary, 3rd edn. Workflow Management Coalition, Winchester (ID) (1999)
Moore, C.: Common Mistakes in Workflow Implementations. Giga Information Group, Cambridge, MA (2002)
Kumar, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Dynamic Work Distributio. In: Workflow Management Systems: How to Balance Quality and Performance, Journal of Management Information Systems 18(3) (2002)
Zur Mühlen, M.: Organizational Management in Workflow Applications – Issues and Perspectives. Information Technology and Management 5, 271–291 (2004)
Swersey, A.J.: The Deployment of Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Units. In: Pollock, S.M., et al. (eds.) Handbooks in OR&MS, vol. 6, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1994)
Beni, G., Wang, J.: Swarm intelligence in cellular robotic systems. In: Proc. NATO Advanced Workshop on Robotics and Biological Systems, Il Ciocco, Tuscany, Italy (1989)
Meyer, C., Bonabeau, E.: Swarm Intelligence: A Whole New Way to Think About Business, Harvard Business Review, May 2001, pp. 106–117 (2001)
Ghizzioli, R., Nouyan, S., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: An Ant-Based Algorithm for the Dynamic Task assignment Problem, TR/IRIDIA (2004)
Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G.: Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems, Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999)
Bonabeau, E., Sobkowski, A., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.L.: Adaptive task allocation inspired by a model of division of labor in social insects; Biocomputation and Emergent Computing. World Scientific, Singapore (1997)
Price, R., Tino, P.: Evaluation Of Adaptive Nature Inspired Task Allocation Against Alternate Decentralized Multi-agent Strategies. In: Yao, X., Burke, E.K., Lozano, J.A., Smith, J., Merelo-Guervós, J.J., Bullinaria, J.A., Rowe, J.E., Tiňo, P., Kabán, A., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII. LNCS, vol. 3242, pp. 982–990. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Robinson, G.: Regulation of the division of labor in insect societies. Annual review, Entomol. 37, 637–665 (1992)
Wilson, E.: The sociogenisis of insect colonies. Science 228, 1489–1495 (1985)
Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.: Response threshold reinforcement division of labour in insects societies. In: Proceedings Royal Societies, London (1998)
Campos, M., Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.: Dynamic Scheduling and Division of Labor in Social Insects. Adaptive behaviour 8, 83–92 (2001)
Austin Fire Department: Austin Fire Department, Austin City Connections (2006), http://www.ci.austin.tx.us/fire/default.htm
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, Brandweerstatistiek 2004; Voorburg/Heerlen (2004)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.: Workflow Management: Models, Methods and Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2002)
Gerkey, B., Mataric, M.: Multi-Robot Task assignment: Analyzing the Complexity and Optimality of Key Architectures. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan (2003)
Gottlieb, J., Puchta, A., Solnon, C.: A Study of Greedy, Local Search, and Ant Colony Optimization Approaches for Car Sequencing Problems. In: Raidl, G.R., Cagnoni, S., Cardalda, J.J.R., Corne, D.W., Gottlieb, J., Guillot, A., Hart, E., Johnson, C.G., Marchiori, E., Meyer, J.-A., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoIASP 2003, EvoWorkshops 2003, EvoSTIM 2003, EvoROB/EvoRobot 2003, EvoCOP 2003, EvoBIO 2003, and EvoMUSART 2003. LNCS, vol. 2611, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Rushton, G.: Applications of Location Models, Annual of Operations Research 18 (1989)
Jensen, K.: Coloured Petri Nets, Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use, 2nd edn., vol. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Mehta, A.: Smart Modeling – Basic Methodology and Advanced Tools. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (2000)
Law, A.M., Kelton, W.D.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 3rd edn. MCgraw Hill International Series (2000)
Goldberg, D.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)
Cicirello, V., Smith, S.: Wasp-like Agents for Distributed Factory Coordination. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems 8, 237–266 (2004)
Kittithreerapronchai, O., Anderson, C.: Do ants paint trucks better than chickens? Markets versus response thresholds for distributed dynamic scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2003)
Hays, W.: Statistics, 5th edn., USA, Orlando Florida (1994)
Cicirello, V., Smith, S.: Wasp-like Agents for Distributed Factory Coordination. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents Systems 8, 237–266 (2004)
Bussler, C.: Analysis of the Organization Modeling Capability of Workflow-Management-Systems. In: Amoroso, D.L. (ed.) Conference of the Pacific Research Institute for Information Systems and Management (PRIISM 1996), Maui, HI, USA (1996)
Rupietta, W.: Organizational Models for Cooperative Office Applications. In: Karagiannis, D. (ed.) DEXA 1994. LNCS, vol. 856, Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Kumar, A., Verbeek, H.M.W.: Organizational Modeling in UML and XML in the context of Workflow Systems. In: Matsui, M., Zuccherato, R.J. (eds.) SAC 2003. LNCS, vol. 3006, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Momotko, M., Subieta, K.: Dynamic Changes in Workflow Participant Assignment. In: Manolopoulos, Y., Návrat, P. (eds.) ADBIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2435, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Shen, M., Tzen, G.-H., Lio, D.-R.: Multi-Criteria Task Assignment in Workflow Management Systems. In: Sprague, R.J. (ed.) 36th HICSS, IEEE, Waikoloa, HI (2003)
Huang, Y.-N., Shan, M.-C.: Policy-Based Resource Management. In: Jarke, M., Oberweis, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1626, Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Bussler, C., Jablonski, S.: Policy Resolution for Workflow Management. In: Sprague, R.J. (ed.) HICSS 1995. 28th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, IEEE, Hawaii (1995)
Gomoluch, J., Schroeder, M.: Market-Based Resource Allocation for Grid Computing: A Model and Simulation. In: Proc. 1st. Int’l. Workshop on Middleware for Grid Computing (MGC) (2003)
Krieger, M.J.B., Billeter, J.-B., et al.: Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots. Nature 406(31), 992–995 (2000)
Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 101(1-2), 165–200 (1998)
Tan, J.C., Harker, P.T.: Designing Workflow Coordination: Centralized Versus Market-Based Mechanisms. Information Systems Research 10, 328–342 (1999)
Alt, R., Klein, S., Kuhn, C.: Service Task Allocation as an Internal Market. In: Baets, W.R.J. (ed.) ECIS 1994. Second European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 424–432. Nijenrode University Press, Netherlands (1994)
Wellman, M.P., Walsh, W.E., Wurman, P.R., MacKie-Mason, J.K.: Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling. Games and Economic Behavior 35, 271–303 (2001)
Baggio, G., Wainer, J., Ellis, C.: Applying scheduling techniques to minimize the number of late jobs in workflow systems. In: Handschuh, H., Hasan, M.A. (eds.) SAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3357, pp. 1396–1403. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Bonin, G.: Final Report, Assessment of Fire and EMS Services Branchburg Township, New Jersey; Tridata, A Division of Sustem Planning Corporation (2005)
Mehrotra, S., Butts, C., Kalashnikov, N.: Project Rescue: Challenges in Responding to the Unexpected. SPIE 5304, 179–192 (2004)
Amer, A., Brustoloni, J., Chrysanthis, P.K., Hauskrecht, M., Labrinidis, A., Melhem, R., Mosse, D., Pruhs, K., Comfort, L.: Secure-CITI: A Secure Critical Information Technology Infrastructure for Disaster Management, Hazard Reduction and Response in Metropolitan Regions (2003)
Freßmann, A.: Adaptive Workflow Support for Search Processes within Fire Service Organisations, University of Trier (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reijers, H.A., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., zur Muehlen, M., Appl, W. (2007). Workflow Management Systems + Swarm Intelligence = Dynamic Task Assignment for Emergency Management Applications. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4714. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75182-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75183-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)