Skip to main content

Towards an Epistemic Logic for Uncertain Agents

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent Systems and Applications V (CEEMAS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4696))

  • 633 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a logic for reasoning about probabilistic belief, called PBL r . Our language introduces formulas that express “agent i believes that the probability of ϕ is at least p”. We first provide an inference system of PBL r , and then introduce a probabilistic semantics for PBL r . The soundness and finite model property of PBL r are proved, which ensure the weak completeness and decidability of PBL r .

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundationof China under Grant 60473036.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacchus, F.: Representing and reasoning with probabilistic knowledge: a logical approach to probabilities. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. de, C., Ferreira, N., Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W.: Practical Reasoning for Uncertain Agents. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J.A. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 82–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de, C., Ferreira, N., Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W.: Logical Implementation of Uncertain Agents. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds.) EPIA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3808, pp. 536–547. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning about knowledge and probability. J. ACM 41(2), 340–367 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Information and Computation 87(1/2), 78–128 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Halpern, J.Y., Tuttle, M.R.: Knowledge, probability, and adversaries. J. ACM 40(4), 917–962 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Hoek, W.: Some considerations on the logic PFD: A logic combining modality and probability. J. Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(3), 287–307 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kooi, B.P.: Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 381–408 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Milch, B., Koller, D.: Probabilistic Models for Agent’s Beliefs and Decisions. In: Proc. 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 389–396 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hans-Dieter Burkhard Gabriela Lindemann Rineke Verbrugge László Zsolt Varga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cao, Z. (2007). Towards an Epistemic Logic for Uncertain Agents. In: Burkhard, HD., Lindemann, G., Verbrugge, R., Varga, L.Z. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications V. CEEMAS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4696. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75254-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75254-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75253-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75254-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics