Abstract
In this paper we propose a new tool called OWL-CM (OWL Combining Matcher) that deals with uncertainty inherent to ontology mapping process. On the one hand, OWL-CM uses the technique of similarity metrics to assess the equivalence between ontology entities and on the other hand, it incorporates belief functions theory into the mapping process in order to improve the effectiveness of the results computed by different matchers and to provide a generic framework for combining them. Our experiments which are carried out with the benchmark of Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2006 demonstrate good results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Besana, P.: A framework for combining ontology and schema matchers with Dempster-Shafer. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), Athens, Georgia, pp. 196–200 (2006a)
Besana, P.: Dynamic ontology mapping: a first prototype, SSP Talks, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (2006b)
Bisson, G.: Why and How to Define a Similarity Measure for Object Based Representation Systems. In: Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, pp. 236–246. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)
Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Messa, G.: Results of the HMatch Ontology Matchmaker in OAEI 2006. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), Athens, Georgia, pp. 134–143 (2006)
Convent: Unsolvable problems related to the view integration approach. In: Atzeni, P., Ausiello, G. (eds.) ICDT 1986, vol. 243, pp. 141–156. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)
Do, H., Melnik, S., Rahm, E.: Comparison of schema matching evaluations. In: Chaudhri, A.B., Jeckle, M., Rahm, E., Unland, R. (eds.) NODe-WS 2002, vol. 2593, pp. 221–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: Qom - quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004, vol. 3298, pp. 289–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Hu, W., Cheng, G., Zheng, D., Zhong, X., Qu, Y.: The Results of Falcon-AO in the OAEI 2006 Campaign. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), Athens, Georgia, pp. 124–133 (2006)
Nagy, M., Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E.: Dssim-ontology mapping with uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), Athens, Georgia, pp. 115–123 (2006)
Niedbala, S.: OWL-CtxMatch. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2006), Athens, Georgia, pp. 165–172 (2006)
Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Smets, P.: Belief functions. In: non-standard logics for automated reasoning, pp. 253–286. Academic Press, London (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Laamari, N., Ben Yaghlane, B. (2007). Uncertainty in Semantic Ontology Mapping: An Evidential Approach. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)