Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4806))

Abstract

Currently, many ontologies are available even through they are created by different organizations. Although these ontologies are developed for various application purpores and areas, they often contain overlapping information. In order to achieve interoperability between ontologies, we need to find a way to integrate various ontologies. For example, ontology engineers would like to create new ontologies based on existing ontologies, adapt or extend existing ontologies for the same or different domains. In this context, it is important to find the corresponding entities in different ontologies. The main ideas we contribute to the research field are introducing the expanding ontology tree to determine the semantic similarity of ontologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chimera: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/software/chimaera/

  2. Cohen, W.W., Ravikumar, P., Fienberg, S.E.: A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks IJCAI-2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to match ontologies on the Semantic Web The VLDB Journal.  12(4), 303–319

    Google Scholar 

  4. Euzenat, J.R., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite. In: Proc. 15th ECAI, Valencia (ES (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fausto, G., Pavel, S., Mikalai, Y.: S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foam, http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/meh/foam/

  7. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Güemes, A.H.: A Prototype System for Automatic Ontology Matching Using Polygons. Computer and Electrical Engineering. Jönköping University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Initiative, O.A.E., http://www.ontologymatching.org/evaluation.html

  10. Keet, C.M.: Aspects of Ontology Integration Unpublished (2004), available at: http://www.meteck.org/AspectsOntologyIntegration.pdf

  11. Le, B.T., Dieng-Kuntz, R., Gandon, F.: Ontology Matching: A Machine Learning Approach for building a corporate semantic web in a multi-communities organization. In: ICEIS 2004, Porto, Portugal (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, F., Sandkuhl, K.: Polygon-based Similarity Aggregation for Ontology Matching. In: International Workshop on Semantic and Grid Computing (SGC 2007) in ISPA07, Niagara Falls, Canada (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maponto: http://www.cs.toronto.edu/semanticweb/maponto/

  15. Melnik, S., Garcia-Molina, H., Rahm, E.: Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm. In: Proc. 18th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), San Jose, CA US (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Evaluating Ontology-Mapping Tools: Requirements and Experience. In: Proc. OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop at the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Siguenza, Spain (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT Suite: Interactive Tools for Ontology Merging and Mapping. In: SMI (ed.). Stanford University, CA, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. OntoViz, http://protege.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntoViz

  19. Owl, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  20. Plassard, M.-F.: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Protégé, http://protege.stanford.edu/

  22. SecondString, http://secondstring.sourceforge.net/

  23. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.E.O.: A Survey of Schema-based Matching Approaches. Data Semantics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA-Merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In: 7th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), Seattle, WA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. WordNet, http://wordnet.princeton.edu

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert Meersman Zahir Tari Pilar Herrero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, F., Sandkuhl, K. (2007). A New Expanding Tree Ontology Matching Method. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: OTM 2007 Workshops. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4806. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76890-6_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76890-6_61

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76889-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76890-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics