Skip to main content

Best-Match Method Used in Co-training Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Emerging Technologies in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4819))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1496 Accesses

Abstract

Since 1998 there has been significant interest in supervised learning algorithms that combine labeled and unlabeled data for text learning tasks. The co-training algorithm applied to datasets which have a natural separation of their features into two disjoint sets. In this paper, we demonstrate that when learning from labeled and unlabeled data using co-training algorithm, selecting those document examples first which have two parts of best matching features can obtain a good performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nigam, K., McCallum, A., Thrun, S., Mitchell, T.: Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM. Machine Learning 39(2/3), 103–134 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaakkola, T., Haussler, D.: Exploiting generative models in discriminative classifiers. In: Advances in NIPS 11 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joachims, T.: Transductive inference for text classification using support vector machines. In: Proceedings of ICML 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blum, A., Mitchell, T.M.: Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In: COLT 1998, Madison, WI, USA,

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nigam, K., Ghani, R.: Analyzing the effectiveness and applicability of co-training. In: 9th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2000. Computational Learning Theory, pp. 92–100 (1998), www.cs.cmu.edu/knigam

  6. Lewis, D.D.: Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) Machine Learning: ECML-98. LNCS, vol. 1398, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. McCallum, A., Nigam, K.: A comparison of event models for naive Bayes text classification. In: AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, Tech. rep. WS-98-05, AAAI Press (1998), http://www.cs.cmu.edu/mccallum

  8. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys 34(1), 1–47 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, Y., Liu, X.: A re-examination of Text Categorization Methods. In: SIGIR-99

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, B., Dai, Y., Li, X., Lee, W.S., Yu, P.S.: Building text classifiers using positive and unlabeled examples. In: Proc. of the 3rd IEEE Int’l Conf. on Data Mining. Melbourne (ICDM-03), pp. 179–188. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denis, F.: PAC learning from positive statistical queries. In: Proc. 9th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory-ALT 987, pp. 112–126 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B., Lee, W.S., Yu, P., Li, X.: Partially supervised classification of text documents. In: ICML-02

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shih, L.K., Karger, D.R.: Using URLs and table layout for Web classification tasks. In: Feldman, S., Uretsky, M., Najork, M., Wills, C.E. (eds.) Proc. of the 13th Int’l Conf. on the World Wide Web (WWW-2004), pp. 193–202. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 39(1), 1–38 (1977)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Brualdi, R.A.: Introductory Combinatorics, 3rd edn., pp. 200–300. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Keerthi, S.S., Shevade, S.K., Bhattacharyya, C., Murthy, K.R.K.: Improvements to Platt’s SMO Algorithm for SVM Classifier Design. Neural Computation 13(3), 637–649

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Takashi Washio Zhi-Hua Zhou Joshua Zhexue Huang Xiaohua Hu Jinyan Li Chao Xie Jieyue He Deqing Zou Kuan-Ching Li Mário M. Freire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, H., Ji, L., Zuo, W. (2007). Best-Match Method Used in Co-training Algorithm. In: Washio, T., et al. Emerging Technologies in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4819. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77018-3_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77018-3_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77016-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77018-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics