Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 46))

  • 701 Accesses

Summary

In this paper, we investigate reducts preserving a structure induced from dominance-based rough sets as well as a structure from variable-precision dominance-based rough sets. It is shown that three kinds of reducts are obtained in the dominance-based rough set approach. For each kind of reduct, a discernibility matrix is given for the enumeration of the reducts. Moreover, it is shown that four kinds of reducts are obtained in the variable-precision dominance-based rough set approach. A counter-example showing the impossibility of reduct enumeration in the case of variable-precision dominance-based rough set approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ślȩzak, D.: Various approaches to reasoning with frequency based decision reducts: A survey. In: Polkowski, L., Tsumoto, S., Lin, T.Y. (eds.) Rough set methods and applications, pp. 235–285. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Inuiguchi, M., Tsurumi, M.: Measures based on upper approximations of rough sets for analysis of attribute importance and interaction. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control 2(1), 1–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Inuiguchi, M.: Attribute reduction in variable precision rough set model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 14(4), 461–479 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. In: Gal, T., Stewart, T.J., Hanne, T. (eds.) Multicriteria decision making: Advances in MCDM models, algorithms, theory, and applications, pp. 14.1–14.59. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Decision rule approach. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple criteria decision analysis, pp. 507–561. Springer, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Susmaga, R., et al.: Generation of reducts and rules in multi-attribute and multi-criteria classification. Control and Cybernetics 29(4), 969–988 (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Inuiguchi, M., Yoshioka, Y.: Variable-precision dominance-based rough set approach. In: Greco, S., et al. (eds.) RSCTC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4259. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Van-Nam Huynh Yoshiteru Nakamori Hiroakira Ono Jonathan Lawry Vkladik Kreinovich Hung T. Nguyen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inuiguchi, M., Yoshioka, Y. (2008). Several Reducts in Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach. In: Huynh, VN., Nakamori, Y., Ono, H., Lawry, J., Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, H.T. (eds) Interval / Probabilistic Uncertainty and Non-Classical Logics. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 46. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77664-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77664-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77663-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77664-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics