Skip to main content

Database Preferences Queries – A Possibilistic Logic Approach with Symbolic Priorities

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4932))

Abstract

The paper presents a new approach to database preferences queries, where preferences are represented in a possibilistic logic manner, using symbolic weights. The symbolic weights may be processed without assessing their precise value, which leaves the freedom for the user to not specify any priority among the preferences. The user may also enforce a (partial) ordering between them, if necessary. The approach can be related to the processing of fuzzy queries whose components are conditionally weighted in terms of importance. Here, importance levels are symbolically processed, and refinements of both Pareto ordering and minimum ordering are used. The representational power of the proposed setting is stressed, while the approach is compared with database Best operator-like methods and with the CP-net approach developed in artificial intelligence. The paper also provides a structured and rather broad overview of the different lines of research in the literature dealing with the handling of preferences in database queries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Wimmers, E.L.: A framework for expressing and combining preferences. In: Proc. ACM SIGMOD, pp. 297–306 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Brewka, G., Le Berre, D.: On the relation between qualitative choice logic and possibilistic logic. In: Proc. 10th International Conference IPMU, pp. 951–957 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Towards a possibilistic logic handling of preferences. Applied Intelligence 14, 303–317 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Benferhat, S., Prade, H.: Encoding formulas with partially constrained weights in a possibilistic-like many-sorted propositional logic. In: IJCAI 2005. Proc. of the 9th Inter. Joint Conference on Artificiel Intelligence, pp. 1281–1286 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Börzsönyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The skyline operator. In: Proc. 17th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 421–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bosc, P., Pivert, O.: Some approaches for relational databases flexible querying. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 1, 323–354 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artificial Intelligence Reasoning (JAIR) 21, 135–191 (2004)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C.: Database preference queries revisited. Technical Report TR2004-1934, Cornell University, Computing and Information Science (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brewka, G., Benferhat, S., Le Berre, D.: Qualitative choice logic. Artificial Intelligence 157, 203–237 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chomicki, J.: Preference formulas in relational queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 28, 1–40 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chomicki, J.: Database querying under changing preferences. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 50, 79–109 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciaccia, P.: Querying databases with incomplete cp-nets. In: M-PREF 2007. Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Domshlak, C., Venable, B., Rossi, F.: Reasoning about soft constraints and conditional preferences. In: IJCAI 2003. Proc. 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 215–220 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Prade, H.: Beyond min aggregation in multicriteria decision (ordered) weighted min, discri-min, leximin. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators - Theory and Applications, pp. 181–192. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Using fuzzy sets in flexible querying: Why and how? In: Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H. (eds.) Flexible Query Answering Systems, pp. 45–60 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Bipolarity in flexible querying. In: Andreasen, T., Motro, A., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds.) FQAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2522, pp. 174–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibilistic logic: A retrospective and prospective view. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 144, 3–23 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Fishburn, P.C.: Preferences structures and their numerical representation. Theoretical Computer Science 217, 359–383 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Godfrey, P., Ning, W.: Relational preferences queries via stable skyline. Technical Report CS-2004-03, York University, pp. 1–14 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Relaxing ceteris paribus preferences with partially ordered priorities. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 660–671. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kiessling, W.: Foundations of preferences in database systems. In: Bressan, S., Chaudhri, A.B., Lee, M.L., Yu, J.X., Lacroix, Z. (eds.) VLDB 2002. LNCS, vol. 2590, pp. 311–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lacroix, M., Lavency, P.: Preferences: Putting more knowledge into queries. In: VLDB 1987. Proc. of the 13th Inter. Conference on Very Large Databases, pp. 217–225 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lang, J.: From preferences to combinatorial vote. In: Proc. of KR Conferences, pp. 277–288 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Motro, A.: A user interface to relational databases that permits vague queries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 6, 187–214 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Torlone, R., Ciaccia, P.: Finding the best when it’s a matter of preference. In: SEBD 2002. Proc. 10th Italian National Conference on Advanced Data Base Systems, pp. 347–360 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, N.: Extending CP-nets with stronger conditional preference statements. In: AAAI 2004. Proc. 19th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 735–741 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Sven Hartmann Gabriele Kern-Isberner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hadjali, A., Kaci, S., Prade, H. (2008). Database Preferences Queries – A Possibilistic Logic Approach with Symbolic Priorities. In: Hartmann, S., Kern-Isberner, G. (eds) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4932. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77684-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77684-0_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77683-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77684-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics