Skip to main content

Auctions, Evolution, and Multi-agent Learning

  • Conference paper
Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems III. Adaptation and Multi-Agent Learning (AAMAS 2005, ALAMAS 2007, ALAMAS 2006)

Abstract

For a number of years we have been working towards the goal of automatically creating auction mechanisms, using a range of techniques from evolutionary and multi-agent learning. This paper gives an overview of this work. The paper presents results from several experiments that we have carried out, and tries to place these in the context of the overall task that we are engaged in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angeline, P.J., Pollack, J.B.: Competitive environments evolve better solutions for complex tasks. In: Forrest, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 264–270 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blair, A.D., Sklar, E., Funes, P.: Co-evolution, determinism and robustness. In: Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning, pp. 389–396. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cai, K., Niu, J., Parsons, S.: An empirical game-theoretic analysis of trading strategies in a continuous double auction market. In: Tuylus, K., Nowe, A., guerssoum, Z., Kudenko, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Symposium on Adaptive Learning Agents and Multiagent Systems. LNCS, vol. 4865, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cliff, D.: Minimal-intelligence agents for bargaining behaviours in market-based environments. Technical Report HP-97-91, Hewlett-Packard Research Laboratories, Bristol, England (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cliff, D.: Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types. In: Proceedings of Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering, Hawai’i (May 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cliff, D., Bruten, J.: Less than human: Simple adaptive trading agents for CDA markets. Technical Report HP-97-155, Hewlett-Packard Research Laboratories, Bristol, England (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cliff, D., Bruten, J.: Zero is not enough: On the lower limit of agent intelligence for continuous double auction markets. Technical Report HP-97-155, Hewlett-Packard Research Laboratories, Bristol, England (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cliff, D., Miller., G.F.: Tracking the red queen: Measurements of adaptive progress in co-evolutionary simulations. In: European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 200–218 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: Automated mechanism design: Complexity results stemming from the single-agent setting. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh, pp. 17–24 (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: An algorithm for automatically designing deterministic mechanisms without payments. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, New York, pp. 128–135 (July 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cramton, P., Schwartz, J.: Collusive bidding: Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions. Journal of Regulatory Economics 17(3), 229–252 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erev, I., Roth, A.E.: Predicting how people play games with unique, mixed-strategy eqilibria. American Economic Review 88, 848–881 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ficici, S.G., Pollack, J.B.: Challenges in coevolutionary learning: Arms-race dynamics, open-endedness, and mediocre stable states. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 238–247 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman, D.: The double auction institution: A survey. In: Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pp. 3–25. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gjerstad, S., Dickhaut, J.: Price formation in double auctions. Games and Economic Behaviour 22, 1–29 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gode, D.K., Sunder, S.: Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial sustitute for individual rationality. The Journal of Political Economy 101(1), 119–137 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gode, D.K., Sunder, S.: Lower bounds for efficiency of surplus extraction in double auctions. In: Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pp. 199–219. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hillis, W.D.: Co-evolving parasites improve simulated evolution as an optimization procedure. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 313–324 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holland, J.: Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson, M.O.: Mechanism theory. In: Devigs, U. (ed.) Optimization and Operations Research, The Encyclopedia of Life Support Science, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK (2003) (The working paper version of this article includes a more comprehensive bibliography and some bibliographic notes)

    Google Scholar 

  21. http://sourceforge.net/projects/jasa/

  22. http://jcat.sourceforge.net/

  23. Jordan, P.R., Kiekintveld, C., Wellman, M.P.: Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC supply chain game. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jordan, P.R., Wellman, M.P.: Best-first search for approximate equilibria in empirical games. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, Vancouver, BC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Klemperer, P.: How (not) to run auctions: The European 3G telecom auctions. European Economic Review 46, 829–845 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Madhavan, A.: Trading mechanisms in securities markets. The Journal of Finance 47(2), 607–641 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maskin, E.S., Riley, J.G.: Auction theory with private values. American Economic Review 75, 150–155 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  29. McAfee, R.P.: A dominant strategy double auction. Journal of Economic Theory 56, 343–450 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McAfee, R.P., McMillan, J.: Analyzing the airwaves auction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 159–176 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McMillan, J.: Selling spectrum rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 191–199 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. McMillan, J.: Reinventing the Bazaar: A Natural History of Markets. In: W. W. Norton & Company (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, G.F., Cliff, D.: Protean behavior in dynamic games: Arguments for the co-evolution of pursuit-evasion tactics. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, pp. 411–420 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolaisen, J., Petrov, V., Tesfatsion, L.: Market power and efficiency in a computational electricity market with discriminatory double-auction pricing. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5(5), 504–523 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Niu, J., Cai, K., Parsons, S., Sklar, E.: Reducing price fluctuation in continuous double auctions through pricing policy and shout improvement. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Hakodate, Japan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Niu, J., Cai, K., Parsons, S., Sklar, E.: Some preliminary results on competition between markets for automated traders. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, Vancouver, BC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Phelps, S., Marcinkiewicz, M., Parsons, S., McBurney, P.: A novel method for automated strategy acquisition in n-player non-zero-sum games. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Hakodate, Japan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Phelps, S., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sklar, E.: Co-evolutionary mechanism design: A preliminary report. In: Padget, J., Shehory, O., Parkes, D., Sadeh, N., Walsh, W.E. (eds.) Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce IV. Designing Mechanisms and Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2531, pp. 123–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Phelps, S., McBurney, P., Sklar, E., Parsons, S.: Using genetic programming to optimise pricing rules for a double auction market. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Agents and Electronic Commerce, Pittsburgh, PA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Phelps, S., Parsons, S., McBurney, P.: An evolutionary game-theoretic comparison of two double auction markets. In: Faratin, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A. (eds.) AMEC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3435, pp. 101–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Posada, M.: Strategic software agents in a continuous double auction under dynamic environments. In: Corchado, E., Yin, H., Botti, V., Fyfe, C. (eds.) IDEAL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4224, pp. 1223–1233. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Posada, M., Hernández, C., López-Paredes, A.: Strategic behaviour in continuous double auction. In: Bruun, C. (ed.) Advances in Artificial Economies: The Economy as a Complex Dynamic System. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Berlin, vol. 584, pp. 31–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Preist, C., van Tol, M.: Adaptative agents in a persistent shout double auction. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on the Internet, Computing and Economics, pp. 11–18. ACM Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Roth, A.E.: The economist as engineer: Game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70, 1341–1378 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Roth, A.E., Erev, I.: Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 164–212 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Rust, J., Miller, J.H., Palmer, R.: Behaviour of trading automata in a computerized double auction market. In: Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pp. 155–199. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rust, J., Miller, J.H., Palmer, R.: Characterizing effective trading strategies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18, 61–96 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rustichini, A., Satterthwaite, M.A., Williams, S.R.: Convergence to efficiency in a simple market with incomplete information. Econometrica 62(5), 1041–1063 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Satterthwaite, M.A., Williams, S.R.: The Bayesian theory of the k-double auction. In: Friedman, D., Rust, J. (eds.) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pp. 99–123. Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Shah, A., Thomas, S.: David and Goliath: Displacing a primary market. Global Financial Markets 1(1), 14–21 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Smith, V.L.: An experimental study of competitive market behaviour. The Journal of Political Economy 70(2), 111–137 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, V.L.: Microeconomics as a experimental science. The American Economic Review 72(5), 923–955 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tesauro, G., Das, R.: High-performance bidding agents for the continuous double auction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tesauro, G., Kephart, J.O.: Pricing in agent economies using multi-agent Q-learning. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5(3), 289–304 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed bids. Journal of Finance 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vorobeychik, Y., Kiekintveld, C., Wellman, M.P.: Empirical mechanism design: Methods, with application to a supply chain scenario. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Walia, V., Byde, A., Cliff, D.: Evolving auction design in zero-intelligence trader markets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Commerce, IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Walsh, W.E., Das, R., Tesauro, G., Kephart, J.O.: Analyzing complex strategic interactions in multi-agent systems. In: Gymtrasiwicz, P., Parsons, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wellman, M.P.: A market-oriented programming environment and its application to distributed multicommodity flow problems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1, 1–23 (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Wurman, P.R., Walsh, W.E., Wellman, M.P.: Flexible double auctions for electronic commerce: Theory and applications. Decision Support Systems 24, 17–27 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhan, W., Friedman, D.: Markups in double auction markets. Technical report, LEEPS, Department of Economics, University of Santa Cruz (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Karl Tuyls Ann Nowe Zahia Guessoum Daniel Kudenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Phelps, S., Cai, K., McBurney, P., Niu, J., Parsons, S., Sklar, E. (2008). Auctions, Evolution, and Multi-agent Learning. In: Tuyls, K., Nowe, A., Guessoum, Z., Kudenko, D. (eds) Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems III. Adaptation and Multi-Agent Learning. AAMAS ALAMAS ALAMAS 2005 2007 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4865. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77949-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77949-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77947-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77949-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics