Abstract
This paper presents an approach to the efficient verification of embedded systems. Such systems usually operate in uncertain environments, giving rise to a high degree of nondeterminism in the corresponding formal models, which in turn aggravates the state explosion problem. Careful handling of nondeterminism is therefore crucial for obtaining efficient model checking tools. Here, we support this goal by developing a formal computation model and an abstraction method, called delayed nondeterminism, which instantiates nondeterministic values only if and when this is required by the application code. It is shown how this technique can be integrated into our CTL model checking tool [mc]square by introducing symbolic abstract states which represent several concrete states. We also give a simulation relation between the concrete and the abstract state space, thus establishing the soundness of delayed nondeterminism with respect to “path-universal” logics such as ACTL and LTL. Furthermore, a case study is presented in which three different programs are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Holzmann, G.J.: The Spin Model Checker: Primer and Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Larsen, K.G., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Uppaal in a nutshell. Int. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 1(1–2), 134–152 (1997)
Mehler, T.: Challenges and Applications of Assembly-Level Software Model Checking. PhD thesis, Universität Dortmund (2005)
Mercer, E.G., Jones, M.D.: Model checking machine code with the GNU debugger. In: Godefroid, P. (ed.) SPIN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3639, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Schlich, B., Kowalewski, S.: [mc]square: A model checker for microcontroller code. In: Margaria, T., Philippou, A., Steffen, B. (eds.) Proc. 2nd Int’l Symp. Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (IEEE-ISoLA 2006), IEEE proceedings (2006)
Schlich, B., Rohrbach, M., Weber, M., Kowalewski, S.: Model checking software for microcontrollers. Technical Report AIB-2006-11, RWTH Aachen University (2006)
Balakrishnan, G., et al.: WYSINWYX: What You See Is Not What You eXecute. In: Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments, Springer, Heidelberg (to appear2007)
Schlich, B., Kowalewski, S.: An extendable architecture for model checking hardware-specific automotive microcontroller code. In: Schnieder, E., Tarnai, G. (eds.) Proc. 6th Symp. Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems (FORMS/FORMAT 2007)GZVB, pp. 202–212 (2007)
Meseguer, J., Thati, P.: Symbolic reachability analysis using narrowing and its application to verification of cryptographic protocols. ENTCS 117, 153–182 (2005)
Clark, A.: A lazy non–deterministic functional language (2000), http://www.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/staff/tony/docs/LazyNonDetLanguage.ps
Bryant, R.E.: A methodology for hardware verification based on logic simulation. Journal of the ACM 38(2), 299–328 (1991)
Godefroid, P., Klarlund, N., Sen, K.: Dart: Directed automated random testing. SIGPLAN Not. 40(6), 213–223 (2005)
Sen, K., Marinov, D., Agha, G.: CUTE: A concolic unit testing engine for C. In: ESEC/FSE-13: Proc. 10th European Software Engineering Conference/13th ACM SIGSOFT Int. Symp. on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 263–272. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Visser, W., Havelund, K., Brat, G., Park, S., Lerda, F.: Model checking programs. Automated Software Engineering Journal 10(2) (2003)
Leven, P., Mehler, T., Edelkamp, S.: Directed error detection in C++ with the assembly-level model checker StEAM. In: Graf, S., Mounier, L. (eds.) SPIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2989, pp. 39–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Heljanko, K.: Model checking the branching time temporal logic CTL. Research Report A45, Helsinki University of Technology (1997)
Vergauwen, B., Lewi, J.: A linear local model checking algorithm for CTL. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 447–461. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)
Emerson, E.: Temporal and Modal Logics. In: Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)
Schlich, B., Löll, J., Kowalewski, S.: Application of static analyses for state space reduction to microcontroller assembly code. In: Proc. Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems (FMICS 2007). LNCS, Springer, Heidelberg (to appear)
Schlich, B., Salewski, F., Kowalewski, S.: Applying model checking to an automotive microcontroller application. In: Proc. IEEE 2nd Int’l Symp. Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES 2007), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)
Saidi, H.: Model checking guided abstraction and analysis. In: Palsberg, J. (ed.) SAS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1824, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Noll, T., Schlich, B. (2008). Delayed Nondeterminism in Model Checking Embedded Systems Assembly Code. In: Yorav, K. (eds) Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing. HVC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4899. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77966-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77966-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77964-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77966-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)