Skip to main content

A Modifier Hypothesis on the Japanese Indeterminate Quantifier Phrase

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (JSAI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4914))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1118 Accesses

Abstract

Shimoyama’s [20, 21] analysis of the Japanese indeterminate quantifier construction (e.g. dono gakusei-mo odotta. ‘Every student danced’) is superior to previous analyses in the sense that it closely adheres to the Principle of Compositionality. However, under this analysis the mo-phrase of the form [[...wh...]NP-mo], is analyzed as a generalized quantifier of semantic type < < e,t > ,t >, and this gives rise to a type-theoretical problem. In order to overcome the difficulties, this paper proposes an alternative analysis in which the mo-phrase is treated as a modifier of semantic type < < e,t > , < e,t > >. It also discusses sentences in which mo combines with a PP and an IP and argues that here the modifier hypothesis of the mo-phrase can still be maintained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aoyagi, H.: On Association with Focus and Scope of Focus Particles in Japanese. In: Koizumi, M., Ura, H. (eds.) Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1, pp. 23–44. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barker, C.: Partitives, Double Genitives and Anti-Uniqueness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 679–717 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chierchia, G.: Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hagstrom, P.: Decomposing Questions. Ph.D. Diss. MIT (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamblin, C.: Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10, 41–53 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hasegawa, N.: Floating Quantifiers and Bare NP Expressions. In: Hasegawa, N. (ed.) Japanese Syntax in Comparative Grammar, pp. 115–145. Kuroshio, Tokyo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heycock, C.: Syntactic Predication in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2, 167–211 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heycock, C., Lee, Y.-S.: Subject and Predication in Korean and Japanese. In: Hoji, H. (ed.) Japanese /Korean Linguistics, pp. 239–253. CSLI, Stanford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kobuchi-Philip, M.: Distributivity and the Japanese Floating Numeral Quantifier. Ph.D. Diss. CUNY Graduate Center (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kobuchi-Philip, M.: Identity of the Domain of Quantification for the Numeral. In: Tasmowski, L., Vogeleer, S. (eds.) Non-Definiteness and Plurality, pp. 267–290. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobuchi-Philip, M.: Semantics of the Cardinal Partitive. In: Puig-Waldmüller, E. (ed.) Proceedings of the Conference Sinn und Bedeutung, vol. 11, pp. 390–402. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kratzer, A.: An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Landman, F.: Events and Plurality. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Link, G.: The Logical Analysis of Plural and Mass Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach. In: Bäuerle, R., Schwarze, C., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pp. 302–323. de Gruyter, Berlin (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lasnik, H., Saito, M.: Move α: Conditions on Its Application and Output. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nishigauchi, T.: Quantification in Syntax. Ph.D. Diss. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nishigauchi, T.: Quantification in the Theory of Grammar. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ohno, Y.: Mo. In: Bach, E., Kratzer, A., Partee, B.H. (eds.) Papers on Quantification. NSF Grant Report. Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 224–250 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Partee, B.: Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles. In: Groenendijk, J., de Jongh, D., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, pp. 115–143. Foris, Dordrecht (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shimoyama, J.: Wh-Constructions in Japanese. Ph.D. Diss. University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shimoyama, J.: Indeterminate Phrase Quantification in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14, 139–173 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. von Stechow, A.: Against LF Pied-Piping. Natural Language Semantics 4, 57–110 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watanabe, A.: Wh-in-Situ, Subjacency, and Chain Formation. In: WWW 1995, MITWPL, Cambridge MA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ken Satoh Akihiro Inokuchi Katashi Nagao Takahiro Kawamura

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kobuchi-Philip, M. (2008). A Modifier Hypothesis on the Japanese Indeterminate Quantifier Phrase. In: Satoh, K., Inokuchi, A., Nagao, K., Kawamura, T. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4914. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78197-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78197-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78196-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78197-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics