Skip to main content

Comparison of Local Classification Methods

  • Conference paper
Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications
  • 6035 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper four local classification methods are described and their statistical properties in the case of local data generating processes (LDGPs) are compared. In order to systematically compare the local methods and LDA as global standard technique, they are applied to a variety of situations which are simulated by experimental design. This way, it is possible to identify characteristics of the data that influence the classification performances of individual methods. For the simulated data sets the local methods on the average yield lower error rates than LDA. Additionally, based on the estimated effects of the influencing factors, groups of similar methods are found and the differences between these groups are revealed. Furthermore, it is possible to recommend certain methods for special data structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • CZOGIEL, I., LUEBKE, K., ZENTGRAF, M. and WEIHS, C. (2006): Localized Linear Discriminant Analysis. In: R. Decker, H.-J. Lenz (Eds.): Advances in Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 133-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • HASTIE, T. J. and TIBSHIRANI, R. J. (1996): Discriminant Analysis by Gaussian Mixtures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 58, 155-176.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSON, N. L. (1949): Systems of Frequency Curves generated by Methods of Translation. Biometrika, 36, 149-176.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • MILLER, D. J. and UYAR, H. S. (1998): Combined Learning and Use for a Mixture Model Equivalent to the RBF Classifier. Neural Computation, 10, 281-293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHIFFNER, J. (2006): Vergleich von Klassifikationsverfahren für lokale Modelle. Diploma Thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • TITSIAS, M. K. and LIKAS, A. (2001): Shared Kernel Models for Class Conditional Density Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 12(5), 987-997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TITSIAS, M. K. and LIKAS, A. (2002): Mixtures of Experts Classification Using a Hierarchi-cal Mixture Model. Neural Computation, 14, 2221-2244.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • TUTZ, G. and BINDER, H. (2005): Localized Classification. Statistics and Computing, 15, 155-166.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schiffner, J., Weihs, C. (2008). Comparison of Local Classification Methods. In: Preisach, C., Burkhardt, H., Schmidt-Thieme, L., Decker, R. (eds) Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics