Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gaussian Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Fuzzy PID Controller Design

  • Chapter
Quantum Inspired Intelligent Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 121))

After having enjoyed an increasingly great popularity in Japan during the last two decades, Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) systems have been investigated in many technical and industrial applications as a powerful modeling tool that can cope with the uncertainties and nonlinearities of modern control systems. Conventional control depends on the mathematical model of the plant being controlled. FLCs have become popular because they do not necessarily require a theoretical model of the plant which is to be controlled. The main drawback of these FLC methodologies in the industrial environment is the number of tuning parameters to be selected. Inspired by the classical particle swarm optimization (PSO) method and quantum mechanics theories, this work presents a novel Quantum-behaved PSO approach using Gaussian distribution (G-QPSO) to tune the design parameters of a FLC with PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) conception. The FLC-PID design has been applied to a control valve with nonlinear dynamic behavior. Numerical results presented here indicate that proposed FLC-PID design with G-QPSO is effective for the control of reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Äström, K. J. and Hägglund, T., The future of PID control, Control Engineering Practice 9(11), 1163–1175, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baptista, L. F., Sousa, J. M. and Costa, J. M. G. S., Fuzzy predictive algorithms applied to real-time force control, Control Engineering Practice 9(4), 411–423, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carvajal, J., Chen, G. and Ogmen, H., Fuzzy PID controller: design, performance, evaluation and stability analysis, Information Sciences 123(3–4), 249–270, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, Y. C., Adaptive fuzzy-based tracking control for nonlinear SISO systems via VSS H8 approaches, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 9(2), 278–292, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, G., Conventional and fuzzy PID controllers: an overview, International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems 1(2), 235–246, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho, H. -J., Cho, K. -B. and Wang B. -H., Fuzzy-PID hybrid control: automatic rule generation using genetic algorithms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92(3), 305–316, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, Y. -W., Park, C. -W. and Park, M., An indirect model reference adaptive fuzzy control for SISO Takagi-Sugeno model, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131(2), 197–215, 2002.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chou, C. -H., Genetic algorithm-based optimal fuzzy controller design in the linguistic space, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 14(3), 372–395, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clerc, M. and Kennedy, J. F., The particle swarm: explosion, stability and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 58–73, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coelho L.S. and Coelho A. A. R., Fuzzy PID controllers: structures, design principles and application for nonlinear practical process, Advances in Soft Computing–Engineering Design and Manufacturing, Roy, R., Furushashi, T. and Chawdhry, K. (eds.), Springer, London, UK, 147–159, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coelho, L. S., A quantum particle swarm optimizer with chaotic mutation operator, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (in press), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cordón, O., Gomide, F., Herrera, F., Hoffmann, F. and Magdalena, Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: current framework and new trends, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 141(1), 5–31, 2004.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Eberhart R.C. and Kennedy J. F., A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, Proceedings of International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Japan, 39–43, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feng, G., A survey on analysis and design of model-based fuzzy control systems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzz Systems 14(5), 676–697, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Golob, M., Decomposed fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative controllers, Applied Soft Computing 1(3), 201–214, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Higashi, N. and Iba, H., Particle swarm optimization with gaussian mutation. Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 72–79, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hirota, K. and Sugeno, M., Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Technology in the World, Advances in Fuzzy Systems: Applications and Theory, vol. 2, Singapore, World Scientific, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hogg, T. and Portnov, D. S., Quantum optimization, Information Sciences 128(3–4), 181–197, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu, B., Mann, G. K. I. and Gosine, R. G., New methodology for analytical and optimal design of fuzzy PID controllers, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 7(5), 521–539, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isermann, R. On fuzzy logic applications for automatic control, supervision and fault diagnosis, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics 28(2), 221–235, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kennedy, J. F. and Eberhart, R.C., Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 1942–1948, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy, J. F., Bare bones particle swarms, Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 80–87, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koo, K. -M., Stable adaptive fuzzy controller with time-varying dead-zone, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 121(1), 161–168, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Krohling, R. and Coelho, L. S. Coevolutionary particle swarm optimization using Gaussian distribution for solving constrained optimization problems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 36(6), 1407–1416, 2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krohling, R., Coelho, L. S. PSO-E: particle swarm with exponential distribution, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Vancouver, Canada, 5577–5582, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kukolj, D. D., Kuzmanovic, S. B. and Levi E., Design of a PID-like compound fuzzy logic controller, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 14(6), 785–803, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwok, D. P., Tam, P., Li, C. K. and Wang, P., Linguistic PID controllers, Proceedings of 11th World Congress of IFAC, Tallin, Estonia, USSR, vol. 7, 192–197, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Levin, F. S., An introduction to quantum theory, Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li, H. X. and Gatland, H. B., Enhanced methods of fuzzy logic control. Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE/IFES, vol. 1, Yokohama, Japan, 331–336, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, H. X., Zhang, L., Cai, K. Y. and Chen, G., An improved robust fuzzy-PID controller with optimal fuzzy reasoning, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics 35(6), 1283–1294, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y. and Ng, K. C., Reduced rule-base and direct implementation of fuzzy logic control, Proceedings of 13th World Congress of IFAC, San Francisco, CA, USA, 85–90, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lin, J. -M., Huang, S. -J. and Shin, K. -R., Application of sliding surface-enhanced fuzzy control for dynamic state estimation of a power system, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 18(2), 570–577, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, J., Xu, W. and Sun, J., Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization with mutation operator, Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Hong Kong, China, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mamdani, E. and Assilian, S., An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller, International Journal on Man Machine Studies 7(1), 1–13, 1975.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Mann, G. K. I., Hu, B. -G. and Gosine, R. G., Analysis of direct action fuzzy PID controller structures, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part B: Cybernetics 29(3), 371–388, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marseguerra, M., Zio, E. and Cadini, F., Genetic algorithm optimization of a model-free fuzzy control system, Annals of Nuclear Energy 32(7), 712–728, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Misir, D., Malki, H. A. and Chen, G., Design and analysis of a fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative controller, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79(3), 297–314, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Pang, X. F., Quantum mechanics in nonlinear systems. World Scientific Publishing Company, River Edge, NJ, USA, 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Passino, K. M. and S. Yurkovich, Fuzzy Control, Addison Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Protopescu, V. and Barhen, J., Solving a class of continuous global optimization problems using quantum algorithms, Physics Letters A 296, 9–14, 2002.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Qiao, W. Z. and Mizumoto, M., PID type fuzzy controller and parameters adaptive method, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78(1), 23–35, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Qin, S. J., Auto-tuned fuzzy logic control, Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 2465–2469, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sala, A., Guerra, T. M. and Babuska, R., Perspectives of fuzzy systems and control, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 156(3), 432–444, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Schweizer, W., Numerical quantum dynamics, Hingham, MA, USA, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Secrest, B. R. and Lamont, G. B., Visualizing particle swarm optimization – gaussian particle swarm optimization, Proceedings of the IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 198–204, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Serra, G. L. O. and Bottura, C. P., Multiobjective evolution based fuzzy PI controller design for nonlinear systems, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 19(2), 157–167, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shayeghi, H., Shayanfar, H. A. and Jalili, A., Multi-stage fuzzy PID power system automatic generation controller in deregulared environments, Energy Conversion and Management 47(18–19), 2829–2845, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sio, K. C. and Lee, C. K., Stability of fuzzy PID controllers, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 28(4), 490–495, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun J., Feng, B. and Xu, W., Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior, Proceedings of Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Portland, Oregon, USA, 325–331, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sun, J., Xu, W. and Feng, B., Adaptive parameter control for quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization on individual level, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Big Island, HI, USA, 3049–3054, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Takagi, T. and Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 15, 116–132.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Vukovic, P. D., One-step ahead predictive fuzzy controller, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 122(1), 107–115, 2001.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Wigren, T., Recursive prediction error identification using the nonlinear Wiener model, Automatica 29(4), 1011–1025, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu, C. -J. and Liu, G. -Y., A genetic approach for simultaneous design of membership functions and fuzzy control rules, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 28(3), 195–211, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, Y., Direct robust adaptive fuzzy control (DRAFC) for uncertain nonlinear systems using small gain theorem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 151(1), 79–97, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8, 338–353, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao, Z. Y., Tomizuka, M. and Isaka, S., Fuzzy gain scheduling of PID controllers, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23(5), 1392–1398, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Production and Systems Engineering Graduate Program, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, LAS/PPGEPS/PUCPR, Imaculada Conceicao, 1155, Zip code 80215-901, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

    Leandro dos Santos Coelho

  2. Department of Electronics Engineering and Telecommunications, Engineering Faculty, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Sala 5022-D, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Nadia Nedjah

  3. Department of System Engineering and Computation, Engineering Faculty, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, Sala 5022-D, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Luiza de Macedo Mourelle

Authors
  1. Leandro dos Santos Coelho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nadia Nedjah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luiza de Macedo Mourelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculdade de Engenharia sala 5022-D, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, 20550-900, MARACANÃ-RJ, Brazil

    Nadia Nedjah  & Luiza de Macedo Mourelle  & 

  2. Centro de Ciências Exatas e de Tecnologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Rua Imaculada Conceição 1155, Curitiba-PR, 80215-901, Brazil

    Leandro dos Santos Coelho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coelho, L.d.S., Nedjah, N., Mourelle, L.d.M. (2008). Gaussian Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Fuzzy PID Controller Design. In: Nedjah, N., Coelho, L.d.S., Mourelle, L.d.M. (eds) Quantum Inspired Intelligent Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 121. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78532-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78532-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78531-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78532-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation