In this paper, we point out four pitfalls for categorizations of objective interestingness measures for rule discovery. Rule discovery, which is extensively studied in data mining, suffers from the problem of outputting a huge number of rules. An objective interestingness measure can be used to estimate the potential usefulness of a discovered rule based on the given data set thus hopefully serves as a countermeasure to circumvent this problem. Various measures have been proposed, resulting systematic attempts for categorizing such measures. We believe that such attempts are subject to four kinds of pitfalls: data bias, rule bias, expert bias, and search bias. The main objective of this paper is to issue an alert for the pitfalls which are harmful to one of the most important research topics in data mining. We also list desiderata in categorizing objective interestingness measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suzuki, E. (2008). Pitfalls for Categorizations of Objective Interestingness Measures for Rule Discovery. In: Gras, R., Suzuki, E., Guillet, F., Spagnolo, F. (eds) Statistical Implicative Analysis. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78983-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78983-3_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78982-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78983-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)