Skip to main content

Understanding Driving Activity Using Ensemble Methods

  • Chapter
Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 132))

Motivation for the use of statistical machine learning techniques in the automotive domain arises from our development of context aware intelligent driver assistance systems, specifically, Driver Workload Management systems. Such systems integrate, prioritize, and manage information from the roadway, vehicle, cockpit, driver, infotainment devices, and then deliver it through a multimodal user interface. This could include incoming cell phone calls, email, navigation information, fuel level, and oil pressure to name a very few. In essence, the workload manager attempts to get the right information to the driver at the right time and in the right way in order that driver performance is optimized and distraction is minimized.

In this chapter we describe three major efforts that have employed our machine learning approach. First, we discuss how we have utilized our machine learning approach to detect and classify a wide range of driving maneuvers, and describe a semi-automatic data annotation tool we have created to support our modeling effort. Second, we perform a large scale automotive sensor selection study towards intelligent driver assistance systems. Finally, we turn our attention to creating a system that detects driver inattention by using sensors that are available in the current vehicle fleet (including forwarding looking radar and video-based lane departure system) instead of head and eye tracking systems.

This approach resulted in the creation of two generations of our workload manager system called Driver Advocate, Driver Advocate that was based on data rather than just expert opinions. The described techniques helped reduce the research cycle times while resulting in broader insight. There was rigorous quantification of theoretical sensor subsystem performance limits and optimal subsystem choices given economic price points. The resulting system performance specs and architecture design created a workload manager that had a positive impact on driver performance [23, 33].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E.R. Boer. Behavioral entropy as an index of workload. In Proceedings of the IEA/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 125–128, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.R. Boer. Behavioral entropy as a measure of driving performance. In Driver Assessment, pp. 225–229, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. Bousquet and A. Elisseeff. Algorithmic stability and generalization performance. In Proceedings of NIPS, pp. 196–202, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123–140, 1996.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5–32, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, and C.J. Stone. Classification and Regression Trees, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Cohn, L. Atlas, and R. Ladner. Improving generalization with active learning. Machine Learning, 15(2):201–221, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.A. Dingus, S.G. Klauer, V.L. Neale, A. Petersen, S.E. Lee, J. Sudweeks, M.A. Perez, J. Hankey, D. Ramsey, S. Gupta, C. Bucher, Z.R. Doerzaph, J. Jermeland, and R.R. Knipling. The 100 car naturalistic driving study: Results of the 100-car field experiment performed by Virginia tech transportation institute. Report DOT HS 810 593, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC, April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fletcher, N. Apostoloff, L. Petersson, and A. Zelinsky. Driver assistance systems based on vision in and out of vehicles. In Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 322–327. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Forbes, T. Huang, K. Kanazawa, and S. Russell. The BATmobile: Towards a Bayesian automated taxi. In Proceedings of Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Guyon and A. Elisseeff. An introduction to feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1157–1182, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Guyon, S. Gunn, M. Nikravesh, and L. Zadeh. Feature Extraction, Foundations and Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2006.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Hankey, T.A. Dingus, R.J. Hanowski, W.W. Wierwille, C.A. Monk, and M.J. Moyer. The development of a design evaluation tool and model of attention demand. Report 5/18/00, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington DC, May 18, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.A. Hess and A. Modjtahedzadeh. A preview control model of driver steering behavior. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 504–509, November 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.A. Hess and A. Modjtahedzadeh. A control theoretic model of driver steering behavior. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 10(5):3–8, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Liu and H. Motoda. Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Kluwer, Boston, MA, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J.C. McCall and M.M. Trivedi. Driver behavior and situation aware brake assistance for intelligent vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(2):374–387, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V.L. Neale, S.G. Klauer, R.R. Knipling, T.A. Dingus, G.T. Holbrook, and A. Petersen. The 100 car naturalistic driving study: Phase 1-experimental design. Interim Report DOT HS 809 536, Department of Transportation, Washington DC, November 2002. Contract No: DTNH22-00-C-07007 by Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ng, M. Jordan, and Y. Weiss. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14: Proceedings of the NIPS 2001, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. Oza. Probabilistic models of driver behavior. In Proceedings of Spatial Cognition Conference, Berkeley, CA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F.J. Pompei, T. Sharon, S.J. Buckley, and J. Kemp. An automobile-integrated system for assessing and reacting to driver cognitive load. In Proceedings of Convergence 2002, pp. 411–416. IEEE SAE, New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L.R. Rabiner. A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2):257–286, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Remboski, J. Gardner, D. Wheatley, J. Hurwitz, T. MacTavish, and R.M. Gardner. Driver performance improvement through the driver advocate: A research initiative toward automotive safety. In Proceedings of the 2000 International Congress on Transportation Electronics, SAE P-360, pp. 509–518, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Schölkopf and A. Smola. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Schreiner, K. Torkkola, M. Gardner, and K. Zhang. Using machine learning techniques to reduce data annotation time. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA, October 16–20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Smith, M. Shah, and N. da Vitoria Lobo. Adetermining driver visual attention with one camera. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 4(4):205, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Torkkola. Automatic alignment of speech with phonetic transcriptions in real time. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP88), pp. 611–614, New York City, USA, April 11–14, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Torkkola, M. Gardner, C. Schreiner, K. Zhang, B. Leivian, and J. Summers. Sensor selection for driving state recognition. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI), IJCNN, pp. 9484–9489, Vancouver, Canada, June 16–21, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Torkkola, N. Massey, B. Leivian, C. Wood, J. Summers, and S. Kundalkar. Classification of critical driving events. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), pp. 81–85, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 23–24, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. Torkkola, N. Massey, and C. Wood. Driver inattention detection through intelligent analysis of readily available sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2004), pp. 326–331, Washington DC, USA, October 3–6, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. Torkkola, S. Venkatesan, and H. Liu. Sensor sequence modeling for driving. In Proceedings of the 18th International FLAIRS Conference, AAAI Press, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA, May 15–17, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. Van Winsum, M. Martens, and L. Herland. The effects of speech versus tactile driver support messages on workload, driver behaviour and user acceptance. TNO-report TM-00-C003, TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Wood, B. Leivian, N. Massey, J. Bieker, and J. Summers. Driver advocate tool. In Driver Assessment, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torkkola, K. et al. (2008). Understanding Driving Activity Using Ensemble Methods. In: Prokhorov, D. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Automotive Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79257-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79256-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79257-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics