Skip to main content

On the Hardness and Existence of Quasi-Strict Equilibria

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4997))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates the computational properties of quasi-strict equilibrium, an attractive equilibrium refinement proposed by Harsanyi, which was recently shown to always exist in bimatrix games. We prove that deciding the existence of a quasi-strict equilibrium in games with more than two players is NP-complete. We further show that, in contrast to Nash equilibrium, the support of quasi-strict equilibrium in zero-sum games is unique and propose a linear program to compute quasi-strict equilibria in these games. Finally, we prove that every symmetric multi-player game where each player has two actions at his disposal contains an efficiently computable quasi-strict equilibrium which may itself be asymmetric.

This material is based upon work supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under grant BR 2312/3-2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J.: Acceptable points in general n-person games. In: Tucker, A.W., Luce, R.D. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games IV, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 40, pp. 287–324. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J.: On the non-transferable utility value: A comment on the Roth-Shafer examples. Econometrica 53(3), 667–678 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt, F., Fischer, F., Harrenstein, P., Shoham, Y.: A game-theoretic analysis of strictly competitive multiagent scenarios. In: Veloso, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1199–1206 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt, F., Fischer, F., Holzer, M.: Symmetries and the complexity of pure Nash equilibrium. In: Thomas, W., Weil, P. (eds.) STACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 212–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the complexity of 2-player Nash-equilibrium. In: Proceedings of the 47th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 261–272. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cubitt, R., Sugden, R.: Rationally justifiable play and the theory of non-cooperative games. Economic Journal 104(425), 798–803 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daskalakis, C., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computing equilibria in anonymous games. In: Proceedings of the 48th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dutta, B., Laslier, J.-F.: Comparison functions and choice correspondences. Social Choice and Welfare 16(4), 513–532 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gale, D., Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W.: On symmetric games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 1, pp. 81–87. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman, New York (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gottlob, G., Greco, G., Scarcello, F.: Pure Nash equilibria: Hard and easy games. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24, 195–220 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Harsanyi, J.C.: Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: A new proof. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 235–250 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jansen, M.J.M.: Regularity and stability of equilibrium points of bimatrix games. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(4), 530–550 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansen, M.J.M.: Regular equilibrium points of bimatrix points. OR Spektrum 9(2), 82–92 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jurg, A.P., Jansen, M.J.M., Potters, J.A.M., Tijs, S.H.: A symmetrization for finite two-person games. ZOR – Methods and Models of Operations Research 36(2), 111–123 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kojima, M., Okada, A., Shindoh, S.: Strongly stable equilibrium points of N-person noncooperative games. Mathematics of Operations Research 10(4), 650–663 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Luce, R.D., Raiffa, H.: Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. Wiley, Chichester (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. McLennan, A., Tourky, R.: Simple complexity from imitation games (unpublished manuscript, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miltersen, P.B., Sørensen, T.B.: Computing sequential equilibria for two-player games. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 107–116. SIAM, Philadelphia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miltersen, P.B., Sørensen, T.B.: Fast algorithms for finding proper strategies in game trees. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 874–883. SIAM, Philadelphia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nash, J.F.: Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Norde, H.: Bimatrix games have quasi-strict equilibria. Mathematical Programming 85, 35–49 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Norde, H., Potters, J., Reijnierse, H., Vermeulen, D.: Equilibrium selection and consistency. Games and Economic Behavior 12(2), 219–225 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadimitriou, C.H., Roughgarden, T.: Computing equilibria in multi-player games. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 82–91. SIAM, Philadelphia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peleg, B., Tijs, S.: The consistency principle for games in strategic form. International Journal of Game Theory 25, 13–34 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Quesada, A.: Another impossibility result for normal form games. Theory and Decision 52, 73–80 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Rozenfeld, O., Tennenholtz, M.: Strong and correlated strong equilibria in monotone congestion games. In: Spirakis, P.G., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S.C. (eds.) WINE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4286, pp. 74–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Squires, D.: Impossibility theorems for normal form games. Theory and Decision 44, 67–81 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. van Damme, E.: Refinements of the Nash Equilibrium Concept. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. van Damme, E.: Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. von Neumann, J.: Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftspiele. Mathematische Annalen 100, 295–320 (1928)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brandt, F., Fischer, F. (2008). On the Hardness and Existence of Quasi-Strict Equilibria. In: Monien, B., Schroeder, UP. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79309-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics