Abstract
Automatic prediction tools play a key role in enabling the application of non-functional analysis to the selection and the assembly of components for component-based systems, without requiring extensive knowledge of analysis methodologies to the application designer. A key idea to achieve this goal is to define a model transformation that takes as input some “design-oriented” model of the component assembly and produces as a result an “analysis-oriented” model that lends itself to the application of some analysis methodology. For this purpose, we define a model-driven transformation framework, centered around a kernel language whose aim is to capture the relevant information for the analysis of non-functional attributes of component-based systems, with a focus on performance and reliability. Using this kernel language as a bridge between design-oriented and analysis-oriented notations we reduce the burden of defining a variety of direct transformations from the former to the latter to the less complex problem of defining transformations to/from the kernel language. The proposed kernel language is defined within the MOF (Meta-Object Facility) framework, to allow the exploitation of existing model transformation facilities. In this chapter, we present the key concepts of our methodology and we show its application to the CoCoME case study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance and Scalability of Distributed Software Architectures: an SPE Approach. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)
Crnkovic, I.: Building Reliable Component-Based Software Systems. Artech House, Inc., Norwood (2002)
Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2002)
Balsamo, S., DiMarco, A., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5), 295–310 (2004)
Hissam, S.A., Moreno, G.A., Stafford, J.A., Wallnau, K.C.: Packaging predictable assembly. In: Bishop, J.M. (ed.) CD 2002. LNCS, vol. 2370, pp. 108–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Object Management Group: UML 2.0 superstructure specification (2002)
Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-driven development: A metamodeling foundation. IEEE Softw. 20(5), 36–41 (2003)
Cortellessa, V., Marco, A.D., Inverardi, P.: Software performance model-driven architecture. In: SAC, pp. 1218–1223 (2006)
Solberg, A., Oldevik, J., Aagedal, J.Ø.: A framework for qos-aware model transformation, using a pattern-based approach. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3291, pp. 1190–1207. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Grassi, V., Mirandola, R., Sabetta, A.: Filling the gap between design and performance/reliability models of component-based systems: A model-driven approach. J. Syst. Softw. 80(4), 528–558 (2007)
Gu, G.P., Petriu, D.C.: From uml to lqn by xml algebra-based model transformations. In: WOSP 2005: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pp. 99–110. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Woodside, M., Petriu, D.C., Petriu, D.B., Shen, H., Israr, T., Merseguer, J.: Performance by unified model analysis (puma). In: WOSP 2005: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pp. 1–12. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Object Management Group: MOF version 2.0, ptc/04-10-15 (2004)
Object Management Group: OMG model driven architecture (2006), http://www.omg.org/mda/
Project website, K., http://klaper.sf.net
Object Management Group: UML profile for schedulability, performance, and time specification (2002)
QVT Partners: Revised submission for MOF 2.0 Query / Views /Transformations RFP (2003)
Grassi, V., Mirandola, R., Sabetta, A.: A model transformation approach for the early performance and reliability analysis of component-based systems. In: Gorton, I., Heineman, G.T., Crnković, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4063, pp. 270–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Woodside, M., Neilson, J., Petriu, D., Majumdar, S.: The stochastic rendezvous network model for performance of synchronous client-server-like distributed software. IEEE Transactions on Computers 44(1), 20–34 (1995)
Rolia, J.A., Sevcik, K.C.: The method of layers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 21(8), 689–700 (1995)
(Eclipse emf project homepage), http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/
Franks, G., Maly, P., Woodside, M., Petriu, D.C., Hubbard, A.: Layered queueing network solver and simulator user manual, lqn software documentation (2006)
(Eclipse homepage), http://www.eclipse.org
(Omondo webpage), http://www.omondo.com
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grassi, V., Mirandola, R., Randazzo, E., Sabetta, A. (2008). KLAPER: An Intermediate Language for Model-Driven Predictive Analysis of Performance and Reliability. In: Rausch, A., Reussner, R., Mirandola, R., Plášil, F. (eds) The Common Component Modeling Example. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5153. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85289-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85289-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85288-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85289-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)