Abstract
The “implementation” and use of smart home technology to lengthen independent living of non-instutionalized elderly have not always been flawless. The purpose of this study is to show that problems with smart home technology can be partially ascribed to differences in perception of the stakeholders involved. The perceptual worlds of caregivers, care receivers, and designers vary due to differences in background and experiences. To decrease the perceptual differences between the stakeholders, we propose an analysis of the expected and experienced effects of smart home technology for each group. For designers the effects will involve effective goals, caregivers are mainly interested in effects on workload and quality of care, while care receivers are influenced by usability effects. Making each stakeholder aware of the experienced and expected effects of the other stakeholders may broaden their perspectives and may lead to more successful implementations of smart home technology, and technology in general.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Provincie Utrecht: Wonen-Welzijn-Zorg: Behoefteontwikkeling en Aanbod in Gemeenten, 2003-2020 Housing-Welfare-Care: Supply and Demand Development in Communities, 2003-2020. Companen, Arnhem (2003)
Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg: Arbeidsmarkt en Zorgvraag Labour Market and Care Demand: Advies Uitgebracht door de Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg aan de Minister en Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport. RVZ, Raad voor de Volksgezondheid & Zorg, Den Haag (2006)
Rogers, W., Cabrera, E., Walker, N., Gilbert, D., Fisk, A.: A Survey of Automatic Teller Machine Usage across the Adult Life Span. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38, 156–166 (1996)
Dyck, J., Smithers, J.: Age Differences in Computer Anxiety: the Role of Computer Experience, Gender and Education. Journal of Educational Computing research 10, 239–248 (1994)
Czaja, S., Charness, N., Fisk, A., Hertzog, C., Nair, S., Rogers, W., Sharit, J.: Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Finding from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 21, 333–352 (2006)
Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hemmings, T., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M.: Design with Care: Technology, Disability and the Home. In: Harper, R. (ed.) Inside the Smart Home, pp. 163–179. Springer, London (2003)
Eyck, A.: Domotica in Senioren Woningen. Zijn Ouderen Bereid deze Nieuwe Voorzieningen te Accepteren en Zijn ze ook in Staat om ze te Gebruiken? [Smart Home Technology in Adapted Homes. Are Elderly Prepared to Accept these New Facilities and are They Able to Use Them?] Maastricht University, Maastricht (2004)
Raappana, A., Rauma, M., Melkas, H.: Impact of safety alarm systems on care personnel. Gerontechnology 6, 112–117 (2007)
Lyons, S., Tripp-Reimer, T., Sorofman, B., DeWitt, J., BootsMiller, B., Vaughn, T., Doebbeling, B.: VA QUERI Informatics Paper: Information Technology for Clinical Guideline Implementation: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12, 64–71 (2005)
Nouws, H., Sanders, L.: Monitoring Toekomst Thuis. Eerste Tussenrapportage: Leerervaringen Voorbereidingsfase [Monitoring Future Home. The First Interim Report: Experiences of the Preparation Phase]. De Vijfde Dimensie, Amersfoort (2007)
Smart Homes: Evaluatieonderzoek Woonzorgcomplex ”Rozenhof II” te Velden en Woonzorgcomplex ”De Waag” te Arcen [Smart Homes: Evaluation Research Sheltered Housing ”Rozenhof II” in Velden and Sheltered Housing ”De Waag” in Arcen]. Smart Homes, Eersel (2004)
van de Leeuw, J.: Veilig en Comfortabel Wonen met Domotica. Beschrijving en Analyse van Vraaggestuurde Domoticaprojecten in de Ouderenhuisvesting [Safe and Comfortable Living with Smart Home Technology. Description and Analysis of Demand Driven Smart Home Projects in Housing for the Elderly]. IWZ, Utrecht (2005)
Becker, H.: Hans Becker, Bestuursvoorzitter Humanitas: Leverancier van Geluk [Hans Becker, Chairman of Humanitas: Supplier of Luck]. Zorg + Welzijn Magazine 3 (2006)
Kearns, W., Rosenberg, D., West, L., Applegarth, S.: Attitudes and Expectations of Technologies to Manage Wandering Behavior in Persons with Dementia. Gerontechnology 6, 89–101 (2007)
Willems, C.: Evaluatie van de Demonstratiefaciliteit Domotica [Evaluation of the Demonstration Facility Domotics]. Gerealiseerd door De Erkenkamp. iRv, Hoensbroek (2007)
van Berlo, A.: Ethics in Domotics. Gerontechnology 3, 170 (2005)
Bussemaker, J.: Zorg voor Ouderen: Om de Kwaliteit van het Bestaan [Care for the Elderly: For the Quality of Life]. Ministerie van VWS, pp. 1–9 (2007)
Soede, M., de Witte, L.: Inaugurale Redes. Uitgesproken bij de Installatie als Lectoren Technologie in de Zorg aan de Hogeschool Zuyd, [Inaugural Speeches. Delivered at the Appointment as Lecturers Technology in Care at the Hogeschool Zuyd. Technologie in de Zorg / Hogeschool Zuyd], Heerlen (2007)
Bosch, A., van Daal, P., Dorrestein, A.: Thuis met Domotica. De Ervaringen van Ouderen in Zes Brabantse Domoticaprojecten. [Home with Domotics. The Experiences of Elderly People in Six Regional Projects] PON, Tilburg (2002)
Melenhorst, A.-S.: Adopting Communication Technology in Later Life. The Decisive Role of Benefits. J.F. Schouten School for User-System Interaction Research, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven (2002)
Verweij, R.: Symposium ter Gelegenheid van de Inaugurele Rede van [Symposium on the Occasion of the Inaugural Speech of] dr. L. de Witte en dr. M. Soede, dd, Hogeschool Zuyd, Maastricht (June 21, 2007)
Hawthorn, D.: Enhancing the Contributions of Older People in Interface Design. Gerontechnology 5, 4–15 (2006)
Fisk, A., Rogers, W., Charness, N., Czaja, S., Sharit, J.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)
Newell, A.: Older People as a Focus for Inclusive Design. Gerontechnology 4, 190–199 (2006)
Whitney, G., Keith, S.: Active Ageing through Universal Design. Gerontechnology 5, 125–128 (2006)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Diego (1993)
Rosson, M., Carroll, J.: Scenario-based Design. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp. 1032–1050. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (2002)
Marzano, S.: The Culture of Ambient Intelligence. In: Aarts, E., Encarnaçäo, J. (eds.) True Visions. The Emergence of Ambient Intelligence, pp. 35–52. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006)
Kittz, It Cares, I&C Services Nederland: ICT in de Care 2004-2006. Ministerie van VWS, Woerden/Groningen, pp. 1–26 (2004)
Chiu, C.-M.: Applying Means-End Chain Theory to Eliciting System Requirements and Understanding Users Perceptual Orientations. Information & Management 42, 455–468 (2005)
Clarkson, P., Keates, S.: A Practical Inclusive Design Approach. In: Proceedings of INCLUDE 2001, London, pp. 72–73 (2001)
Dewsbury, G., Dickinson, A.: Enabling and Applying Person-Centred Design for Older Adults. Gerontechnology 5, 56–57 (2006)
de Ruyter, B., Aarts, E., Markopoulos, P., IJsselsteijn, W.: Ambient Intelligence Research in HomeLab: Engineering the User Experience. In: Weber, W., Rabaey, J., Aarts, E. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence, pp. 49–62. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)
McKenna, S., Marquis-Faulkes, F., Newell, A., Gregor, P.: Requirements Gathering Using Drama for Computer Vision-Based Monitoring in Supportive Home Environments. Gerontechnology 5, 29–45 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sponselee, Am., Schouten, B., Bouwhuis, D., Willems, C. (2008). Smart Home Technology for the Elderly: Perceptions of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders. In: Mühlhäuser, M., Ferscha, A., Aitenbichler, E. (eds) Constructing Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2007. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85379-4_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85379-4_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85378-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85379-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)