Skip to main content

An Introduction to Authorization Conflict Problem in RDF Access Control

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5178))

Abstract

In this paper, related with RDF security, we introduce an RDF triple based access control model considering explicit and implicit authorization propagation. Since RDF Schema represents ontology hierarchy of upper and lower classes or properties, our access control model supports the explicit authorization propagation where an authorization specified against an upper concept is propagated to lower concepts by inheritance. In addition, we consider the implicit authorization propagation where an authorization specified against an lower concept is propagated to upper concepts by RDF inference. RDF Semantics, which is recommended by W3C, guides some primary RDF inference rules related with subClassOf and subPropertyOf where lower concepts are interpreted into upper concepts. Based on these two contrary propagations, we introduce an authorization conflict problem in RDF access control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Damiani, E., Vimercati, S.D.C., Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P.: A fine-grained access control system for XML documents. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 5(2), 169–202 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertino, E., Castano, S., Ferrari, E., Mesiti, M.: Specifying and enforcing access control policies for XML document sources. World Wide Web Journal 3(3), 139–151 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertino, E., Ferrari, E.: Secure and selective dissemination of XML documents. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 5(3), 290–331 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, A., Farkas, C.: Secure resource description framework: an access control model. In: 11th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, pp. 121–129 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qin, L., Atluri, V.: Concept-level Access Control for the Semantic Web. In: ACM Workshop on XML Security 2003, pp. 94–103 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaushik, S., Wijesekera, D., Ammann, P.: Policy-based dissemination of partial web-ontologies. In: The 2005 workshop on Secure web services, pp. 43–52 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reddivari, P., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: Policy-Based Access Control for an RDF Store. In: The Policy Management for the Web Workshop, pp. 78–83 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. RDF Semantics, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ignac Lovrek Robert J. Howlett Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, J., Jung, K., Park, S. (2008). An Introduction to Authorization Conflict Problem in RDF Access Control. In: Lovrek, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5178. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85565-1_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85565-1_72

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85564-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85565-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics