Skip to main content

Using Expressive Dialogues and Gradient Information to Improve Trade-Offs in Bilateral Negotiations

  • Conference paper
E-Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5183))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A bilateral negotiation may be seen as an interaction between two parties with the goal of reaching an agreement over a given range of issues which usually involves solving a conflict of interests between the parties involved. In our previous work, we address the problem of automatic bilateral negotiation by using fuzzy constraints as a mean to express participant’s preferences, focusing in purchase negotiation scenarios. Other research works have used similarity criteria to perform trade-offs in bilateral bargaining scenarios, without any expressive mechanisms between participants. In this paper, we combine our expressive approach with the traditional positional bargaining schema. In particular, we explore the possibility of using the derivatives of each agent’s valuation function to issue direction requests to narrow the solution search space of its counterpart, thus improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the negotiation over traditional positional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3-4), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raiffa, H.: Lectures on negotiation analysis. PON Books, Harvard Law School (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 119–126 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez-Carmona, M.A., Velasco, J.R.: A fuzzy constraint based model for automated purchase negotiations. In: Fasli, M., Shehory, O. (eds.) TADA/AMEC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4452, pp. 234–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-Carmona, M.A., Velasco, J.R., Marsa-Maestre, I.: The agents’ attitudes in fuzzy constraint based automated purchase negotiations. In: Burkhard, H.-D., Lindemann, G., Verbrugge, R., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4696, pp. 246–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ros, R., Sierra, C.: A negotiation meta strategy combining trade-offs and concession moves. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 12(2), 163–181 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehtamo, H., Ketteunen, E., Hamalainen, R.P.: Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research 1(30), 54–69 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kersten, G.E., Noronha, S.J.: Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A Systems and Humans 28(3), 326–338 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Protocols for negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18(6), 32–38 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vo, Q.B., Padgham, L., Cavedon, L.: Negotiating flexible agreements by combining distributive and integrative negotiation. Intelligent Decision Technologies 1(1-2), 33–47 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ehtamo, H., Hamalainen, R.P., Heiskanen, P., Teich, J., Verkama, M., Zionts, S.: Generating pareto solutions in a two-party setting: constraint proposal methods. Management Science 45(12), 1697–1709 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito, T., Hattori, H., Klein, M.: Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: Exploring nonlinear utility spaces. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, pp. 1347–1352 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Giuseppe Psaila Roland Wagner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marsa-Maestre, I., Lopez-Carmona, M.A., Velasco, J.R., Alarcos, B. (2008). Using Expressive Dialogues and Gradient Information to Improve Trade-Offs in Bilateral Negotiations. In: Psaila, G., Wagner, R. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85717-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85717-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85716-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85717-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics