Skip to main content

Experimenting with Small Changes in Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5202))

Abstract

Experimentation of new algorithms is the usual companion section of papers dealing with SAT. However, the behavior of those algorithms is so unpredictable that even strong experiments (hundreds of benchmarks, dozen of solvers) can be still misleading. We present here a set of experiments of very small changes of a canonical Conflict Driven Clause Learning (CDCL) solver and show that even very close versions can lead to very different behaviors. In some cases, the best of them could perfectly have been used to convince the reader of the efficiency of a new method for SAT. This observation can be explained by the lack of real experimental studies of CDCL solvers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biere, A.: Adaptive restart strategies for conflict driven SAT solvers. In: Kleine Büning, H., Zhao, X. (eds.) SAT 2008. LNCS, vol. 4996, pp. 28–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brglez, F., Li, X.Y., Stallmann, M.F.: On SAT instance classes and a method for reliable performance experiments with SAT solvers. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 43, 1–34 (2005)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible sat-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 502–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, E., Novikov, Y.: BerkMin: A fast and robust SAT-solver. Discrete Applied Mathematics 155(12), 1549–1561 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamadi, Y., Jabbour, S., Sais, L.: ManySAT: Solver description. In: System description for the SAT-RACE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, J.: The effect of restarts on the efficiency of clause learning. In: proceedings of IJCAI 2007, pp. 2318–2323 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le Berre, D., Simon, L.: Essentials of the SAT 2003 competition. In: SAT 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moskewicz, M., Madigan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In: Proceedings of DAC 2001, pp. 530–535 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Silva, J.P.M., Sakallah, K.A.: Grasp - a new search algorithm for satisfiability. In: ICCAD, pp. 220–227 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter J. Stuckey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Audemard, G., Simon, L. (2008). Experimenting with Small Changes in Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Algorithms. In: Stuckey, P.J. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5202. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85958-1_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85958-1_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85957-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85958-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics