Skip to main content

Depicting Negation in Diagrammatic Logic: Legacy and Prospects

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5223))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1713 Accesses

Abstract

Here are considered the conditions under which the method of diagrams is liable to include non-classical logics, among which the spatial representation of non-bivalent negation. This will be done with two intended purposes, namely: to review the basic concepts involved in the definition of logical negation; to account for a variety of epistemological obstacles against the introduction of non-classical negations within diagrammatic logic. It will be mainly argued that non-classical logics don’t challenge dichotomy as such but merely show that a logical operator may be a negation without operating as a dichotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brady, R.T.: On the formalization of the Law of non-Contradiction. In: Priest, G., Beall, J.C., Armour-Garb, B. (eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction (New Philosophical Essays), pp. 41–48. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Euler, L.: Lettres à une Princesse d’Allemagne, vol. 2. Academie Imperiale des Sciences, Saint Petersburg (1768)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleene, S.: Introduction to Metamathematics. Van Nostrand, New York (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Łukasiewicz, J.: On three-valued logic. Ruch Filozoficzny 5, 170–171 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parsons, T.: Assertion, Denial, and the Liar Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 13, 137–152 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Priest, G.: The Logic of Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 219–241 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Venn, J.: On the diagrammatic and mechanical representation of propositions and reasonings. Philosophical Magazine 10, 1–18 (1880)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gem Stapleton John Howse John Lee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schang, F., Moktefi, A. (2008). Depicting Negation in Diagrammatic Logic: Legacy and Prospects. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5223. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87729-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87730-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics