Skip to main content

Style-Based Model Transformation for Early Extrafunctional Analysis of Distributed Systems

  • Conference paper
Quality of Software Architectures. Models and Architectures (QoSA 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5281))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 876 Accesses

Abstract

In distributed environments, client-server, publish-subscribe, and peer-to-peer architecture styles are largely employed. However, style selection often remains implicit, relying on the designer’s know-how regarding requirements. In this paper, we propose a framework to explicitly specify distributed architectural styles, as independent models of the application functionalities. To justify feasibility and further benefits of our approach, we formally define three classical distributed architectural styles in a process calculus. Our proposal then opens up the way to a systematic composition of functional models with architectural style models as an endogenous transformation. Comparative analysis of extrafunctional properties could then be proposed at the early design stages to guide the architect in stylistic choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharya, S., Perry, D.E.: Predicting architectural styles from component specifications. In: Proceedings of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture, pp. 231–232. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Kruchten, P., Lago, P., van Vliet, H., Wolf, T.: Building up and exploiting architectural knowledge. In: Hofmeister, C., Crnkovic, I., Reussner, R. (eds.) QoSA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4214. pp. 43–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw, M.: Comparing architectural design styles. IEEE Software 12(6), 27–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Orfali, R., Harkey, D., Edwards, J.: The essential client/server survival guide. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eugster, P.T., Felber, P.A., Guerraoui, R., Kermarrec, A.M.: The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Computing Surveys 35(2), 114–131 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., Spinellis, D.: A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies. ACM Computing Surveys 36(4), 335–371 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. OMG: Object Management Group (Lillerand, J., Mukerji, J. (eds.)) Model Driven Architecture Guide, version 1.0.1 (June 2003), http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf

  8. Garlan, D., Shaw, M.: An introduction to software architecture. Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 2, 1–39 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bushmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., Stal, M.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A system of patterns. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw, M., Clements, P.: Toward boxology: preliminary classification of architectural styles. In: Proceedings of the second international software architecture workshop (ISAW-2) on SIGSOFT 1996 workshops, pp. 50–54. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fielding, R.T., Taylor, R.N.: Principled design of the modern web architecture. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 2(2), 115–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Concurrency: State Models and Java Programs. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Uchitel, S., Chatley, R., Kramer, J., Magee, J.: LTSA-MSC: Tool support for behaviour model elaboration using implied scenarios. In: Garavel, H., Hatcliff, J. (eds.) ETAPS 2003 and TACAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2619. pp. 597–601. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, S.: Security properties and CSP. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 174–187. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E.: Using non-functional requirements to systematically select among alternatives in architectural design. In: First International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems (IWASS), pp. 31–43 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta, N., Medvidovic, N.: Composing architectural styles from architectural primitives. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC), pp. 347–350. ACM press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Modelling distributed software architectures. In: First International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems (IWASS) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(1), 70–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, S., Goddard, S.: xsadl: An architecture description language to specify component-based systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Int. Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, pp. 443–448. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morisawa, Y., Torii, K.: An architectural style of product lines for distributed processing systems, and practical selection method. In: ESEC/FSE-9: Proceedings of the 8th European software engineering conference held jointly with 9th ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Foundations of software engineering, pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. ISO: International Organization for Standardization: Systems and Software Engineering – Recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. ISO/IEC DIS 42010, 90.92 review stage (December 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chung, L., Gross, D., Yu, E.: Architectural design to meet stakeholder requirements. In: Donohue, P. (ed.) Software Architecture, First Working IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA1), Vienna, Austria, pp. 545–564. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grau, G., Franch, X.: A goal-oriented approach for the generation and evaluation of alternative architectures. In: Oquendo, F. (ed.) ECSA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4758. pp. 139–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mallet, J., Rouvrais, S. (2008). Style-Based Model Transformation for Early Extrafunctional Analysis of Distributed Systems. In: Becker, S., Plasil, F., Reussner, R. (eds) Quality of Software Architectures. Models and Architectures. QoSA 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87879-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87879-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87878-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87879-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics