Skip to main content

Requirements for Ontology Based Design Project Assessment

  • Conference paper
Book cover Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (ISoLA 2008)

Abstract

Ontologies are formal knowledge representation. Looking at ontologies in more detail can offer concealed details on the ontology or the conceptualized domain. This requires technologies for ontology analysis. By analysing the use case of R&D management this paper identifies typical metrics on ontologies and evaluates metric calculation mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gruber, T.R.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (hrsg.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Deventer (1993), citeseer.ist.psu.edu/gruber93toward.html

    Google Scholar 

  2. Genero, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C.: Metrics for Software Conceptual Models. Imperial College Press, London (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Green, P., Rosemann, M.: Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis, L.: Evaluation of R&D Processes: Effectiveness Through Measurements. Artech House, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a webontology language. Journal of Web Semanitcs 1 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anselmo, D., Ledgarf, H.: Measuring Productivity in the Software Industry. Communications of the ACM 46 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zuse, H.: Object-oriented Software Measures. In: Proceedings of the Third International Software Metrics Symposium. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kayed, A., Colomb, R.M.: Using BWW model to evaluate building ontologies in CGs formalism. Information Systems 30, S.379–S.398 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Ontological Evaluation of Scheer’s Reference Model for Production Planning and Control Systems - Outline. Modellierung, S.317–S.318 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Opdal, L., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Ontological Evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Model. Softw. Syst. Model, 43–47 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Mario Bunges’s ontology as a formal foundation for information system concepts. In: Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise, Rodopi, Atlanta (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Ontological Analysis of Reference Models. In: Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gomez-Perez, A., Lozano-Tello, A.: Applying the ONTOMETRIC Method to Measure the suitability of Ontologies. In: Bsuiness Systems Analysis with Ontologies. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Saaty, T.: How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Goal Question Metric Approach. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. S.528–S.532. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for Development (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hahn, A., große Austing, S., Strickmann, J.: Metrics - The Business Intelligence Side of PLM. In: Garetti, M. et al. (ed.) Product Lifecycle Management: Assessing the industrial relevance, pp. S.11–S.20. Inderscience Enterprises Limited (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crosby, P.: Quality is Free. Reissue Edition, Signet, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gilmore, H.: Product Conformance Cost. Quality Progress, S. 16–S.19 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deutsch, M., Willis, R.: Software Quality Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nance, R.: Software Quality Indicators: An Holistic Approach to Measurement. In: Proc. 4th Annual Software Quality Workshop. Alexandria Bay, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boehm, B., et al.: Characteristics of Software Quality. North-Holland, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Häusler, S., Hahn, A., Poppen, F.: Real-Time Quality Estimation to Enable Process Evaluation in Integrated Circuit Development. In: Proceedings of the First International Engineering Management Conference in Europe. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Protégé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System, http://protege.stanford.edu/

  25. SPARQL Query Language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  26. ARQ - A SPARQL Processor for Jena, http://jena.sourceforge.net/ARQ/

  27. Jambalaya | The CHISEL Group, University of Victoria, http://www.thechiselgroup.org/jambalaya

  28. Tartir, S. et al.: OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition from Distributed, Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alani, H., Brewster, C., Shadbolt, N.R.: Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Cross, V.V., Pal, A.: OntoCAT: An Ontology Consumer Analysis Tool and Its Use on Product Services Categorization Standards. In: Hepp, M., Tempich, C. (hrsg.) SEBIZ, E.P.B. Simperl (2006), CEUR-WS.org

  31. http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/semweb/sebiz2006.html#CrossP06

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hahn, A., große Austing, S., Häusler, S., Reinelt, M. (2008). Requirements for Ontology Based Design Project Assessment. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. ISoLA 2008. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88479-8_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88479-8_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88478-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88479-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics