Abstract
In this paper we test the effectiveness of a unifying life-cycle framework for the development of affective bi-modal interfaces. The life-cycle framework is called MBIUI and may be used for the application of many different multi-criteria decision making theories in intelligent user interfaces. As a case study we use an affective bi-modal educational system. More specifically, we describe the experimental studies that are proposed in MBIUI for designing, implementing and testing a multi-criteria decision making theory, called Simple Additive Weighting, in the educational application. The decision making theory has been adapted in the user interface for combining evidence from two different modes and providing affective interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hull, M.E.C., Taylor, P.S., Hanna, J.R.P., Millar, R.J.: Software development processes- an assessment. Information and Software Technology 44, 1–12 (2002)
Kabassi, K., Virvou, M.: A Knowledge-based Software Life-Cycle Framework for the incorporation of Multi-Criteria Analysis in Intelligent User Interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 18(9), 1–13 (2006)
Fishburn, P.C.: Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Set: Applications to Priorities and Assignments, Operations Research (1967)
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186 (1981)
Naumann, F.: Data Fusion and Data Quality. In: Proceedings of the New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics (1998)
Schütz, W., Schäfer, R.: Bayesian networks for estimating the user’s interests in the context of a configuration task. In: Schäfer, R., Müller, M.E., Macskassy, S.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the UM 2001 Workshop on Machine Learning for User Modeling, pp. 23–36 (2001)
Bohnenberger, T., Jacobs, O., Jameson, A., Aslan, I.: Decision-Theoretic Planning Meets User Requirements: Enhancements and Studies of an Intelligent Shopping Guide. In: Gellersen, H.-W., Want, R., Schmidt, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3468, pp. 279–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Kudenko, D., Bauer, M., Dengler, D.: Group Decision Making Through Mediated Discussions. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modelling (2003)
Rich, E.: Stereotypes and User Modeling. In: Kobsa, A., Wahlster, W. (eds.) User Models in Dialog Systems, pp. 199–214 (1989)
Rich, E.: Users are individuals: individualizing user models. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 51, 323–338 (1999)
Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
Kass, R., Finin, T.: The role of User Models in Cooperative Interactive Systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 4, 81–112 (1989)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kabassi, K., Virvou, M., Alepis, E. (2008). Testing the Effectiveness of MBIUI Life-Cycle Framework for the Development of Affective Interfaces. In: Filipe, J., Shishkov, B., Helfert, M., Maciaszek, L.A. (eds) Software and Data Technologies. ICSOFT ENASE 2007 2007. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88655-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88655-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88654-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88655-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)