Skip to main content

Model Ontological Commitments Using ORM +  in T-Lex

  • Conference paper
  • 1615 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5333))

Abstract

When designing and developing ontology based applications, we semantically ground them by ontologically committing the application rules to their respective domain. These rules can be, for instance decision rules for a decision support system. For the DOGMA framework we have introduced ORM + , a novel extension of ORM for modeling, visualizing and interchanging ontological commitments. In this paper, we illustrate our ongoing research on ORM +  and T-Lex as its supporting tool. We demonstrate in the field of on-line customer management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Curland, M., Halpin, T.: Model Driven Development with NORMA. In: Proc. 40th Int. Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS-40). CD-ROM, p. 10. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Demey, J., Jarrar, M., Meersman, R.: Markup Language for ORM Business Rules. In: Proc. Of International Workshop on Rule Markup Languages for Business Rules on the Semantic Web (RuleML-ISWC 2002 workshop) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eades, P.: A heuristic for graph drawing. Congressus Numerantium 42, 149–160 (1984)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fluit, C., Sabou, M., van Harmelen, F.: Supporting user tasks through visualisation of light-weight ontologies. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. Int. Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 415–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabel, T., Sure, Y., Völker, J.: Kaon – ontology management infrastructure. SEKT informal deliverable 3.1.1.a, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O., Fernandez-Lopez, M.: Ontological Engineering. Springer, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber, T.R.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padva, Italy. Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guarino, N.: Understanding, Building, and Using Ontologies: A commentary to Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development. In: van Heijst, S., Wielinga (eds.) International Journal of Human and Computer Studies 46, 293–310 (1997), http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/guarino97understanding.html

  9. Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases: From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halpin, T.A.: Business Rule Modality. In: Proc. Of Eleventh Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design, EMMSAD 2006 (2006), http://www.orm.net/pdf/RuleModality.pdf

  11. Halpin, T.A., Curland, M.: Automated Verbalization for ORM 2. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1181–1190. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kripke, S.: Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic. APF 16, 83–94 (1963)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lambrix, P., Edberg, A.: Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 589–600 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meersman, R.: The use of lexicons and other computer-linguistic tools in semantics, design and cooperation of database systems. In: Zhang, Y., Rusinkiewicz, M., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) The Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Cooperative Database Systems for Advanced Applications (CODAS 1999), pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mutton, P., Golbeck, J.: Visualization of semantic metadata and ontologies. In: IV 2003: Proceedings of the Seventh Int. Conference on Information Visualization, Washington, DC, USA, p. 300. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.L.: Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Technical Report KSL-01-05, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pretorious, J.A.: Lexon visualization: Visualizing binary fact types in ontology bases. In: Lambrix, P., Edberg, A. (eds.) IV 2004, pp. 58–6310 (2004); Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 589–600 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spyns, P., Meersman, R., Jarrar, M.: Data modeling versus Ontology engineering. SIGMOD Record: Special Issue on Semantic Web and Data Management 31(4), 12–17 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Storey, M., Musen, M., Silva, J., Best, C., Ernst, N., Fergerson, R., Noy, N.: Jambalaya: Interactive visualization to enhance ontology authoring and knowledge acquisition in protégé (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sure, Y., Erdmann, M., Angele, J., Staab, S., Studer, R., Wenke, D.: OntoEdit: Collaborative ontology development for the Semantic Web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 221–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, Y., Spyns, P., Meersman, R.: Towards Semantically Grounded Decision Rules Using ORM+. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 78–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: On constructing semantic decision tables. In: Wagner, R., Revell, N., Pernul, G. (eds.) DEXA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4653, pp. 34–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Trog, D., Vereecken, J., Christiaens, S., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: T-Lex: a Role-based Ontology Engineering Tool. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1191–1200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Trog, D., Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: Towards Ontological Commitments with O-RIDL Markup Language. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds.) RuleML 2007. LNCS, vol. 4824, pp. 92–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, Y., Trog, D. (2008). Model Ontological Commitments Using ORM +  in T-Lex. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2008 Workshops. OTM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5333. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88875-8_103

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88874-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88875-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics