Abstract
In this chapter, we present a new interactive procedure for multiobjective optimization, which is based on the use of a set of value functions as a preference model built by an ordinal regression method. The procedure is composed of two alternating stages. In the first stage, a representative sample of solutions from the Pareto optimal set (or from its approximation) is generated. In the second stage, the Decision Maker (DM) is asked to make pairwise comparisons of some solutions from the generated sample. Besides pairwise comparisons, the DM may compare selected pairs from the viewpoint of the intensity of preference, both comprehensively and with respect to a single criterion. This preference information is used to build a preference model composed of all general additive value functions compatible with the obtained information. The set of compatible value functions is then applied on the whole Pareto optimal set, which results in possible and necessary rankings of Pareto optimal solutions. These rankings are used to select a new sample of solutions, which is presented to the DM, and the procedure cycles until a satisfactory solution is selected from the sample or the DM comes to conclusion that there is no satisfactory solution for the current problem setting. Construction of the set of compatible value functions is done using ordinal regression methods called UTA\(^{\mbox{\scriptsize GMS}}\) and GRIP. These two methods generalize UTA-like methods and they are competitive to AHP and MACBETH methods. The interactive procedure will be illustrated through an example.
Reviewed by: Jerzy Błaszczyński, Poznań University of Technology, Poland; Daisuke Sasaki, University of Cambridge, UK; Kalyanmoy Deb, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, India
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH: An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. International Transactions in Operational Research 1(4), 387–500 (1994)
Bana e Costa, C.A., De Corte, J.M., Vansnick, J.C.: On the mathematical foundation of MACBETH. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 409–443. Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York (2005)
Chakhar, S., Mousseau, V.: GNU-UTA: a GNU implementation of UTA methods (2007), http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/~mousseau/GNU-UTA
Consortium, D.D.: Decision deck: an open-source software platform for mcda methods (2006-2008), www.decision-deck.org
Figueira, J., Greco, S., Słowiński, R.: Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. European Journal of Operational Research, to appear
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. In: Gal, T., Hanne, T., Stewart, T. (eds.) Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications, pp. 1–14. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129, 1–47 (2001)
Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Assessing a partial preorder of alternatives using ordinal regression and additive utility functions: A new UTA method. In: 58th Meeting of the EURO Working Group on MCDA, Moscow (2003)
Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., Słowiński, R.: Decision rule approach. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 507–562. Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York (2005)
Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research 191(2), 416–436 (2008)
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10(2), 151–164 (1982)
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Meziani, R., Słowiński, R.: MOLP with an interactive assessment of a piecewise linear utility function. European Journal of Operational Research 31, 350–357 (1987)
Kiss, L., Martel, J., Nadeau, R.: ELECCALC - an interactive software for modelling the decision maker’s preferences. Decision Support Systems 12(4-5), 757–777 (1994)
March, J.: Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9, 587–608 (1978)
Marichal, J., Roubens, M.: Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research 124(3), 641–650 (2000)
Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization 12(2), 157–174 (1998)
Pekelman, D., Sen, S.: Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights. Management Science 20(8), 1217–1229 (1974)
Roy, B., Bouyssou, D.: Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica, Paris (1993)
Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)
Saaty, T.: The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: The State of the Art Surveys, pp. 345–407. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc., New York (2005)
Siskos, Y., Grigoroudis, V., Matsatsinis, N.: UTA methods. In: Figueira, F., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 297–343. Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York (2005)
Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Matarazzo, B.: Rough set based decision support. In: Burke, E., Kendall, G. (eds.) Introductory Tutorials on Optimization, Search and Decision Support Methodologies, pp. 475–527. Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York (2005)
Srinivasan, V., Shocker, A.: Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments. Psychometrika 38(4), 473–493 (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R. (2008). Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Using a Set of Additive Value Functions. In: Branke, J., Deb, K., Miettinen, K., Słowiński, R. (eds) Multiobjective Optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5252. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-88907-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-88908-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)